Jacek Karnowski, editor-in-chief of “Sieci”, “A compromise was politically necessary. The game goes on”, led to a lively discussion on Twitter. A very different view of the government agreement with the EC was presented by TVP journalist Cezary Gmyz and EU Agriculture Commissioner Janusz Wojciechowski.
READ ALSO:
— Szynkowski vel Sęk: We count on support in the Sejm. If it turned out that the opposition is now in dispute with the European Commission, that would be a grotesque situation
— The Minister of European Affairs replies Bosak: The amendment of the law on the Supreme Court does not violate the constitution; Judges are not allowed to question each other at will
This is not a compromise. This is capitulation
– wrote Cezary Gmyz.
Wojciechowski’s answer
Janusz Wojciechowski spoke in a completely different tone.
No, it’s a compromise. Poland’s forced transfer of disciplinary and immunity cases to the Supreme Administrative Court (further from camaraderie) has come as a shock to many legal circles and has already sparked protests
said the EU Commissioner for Agriculture.
The EC did not demand it, Poland got what it wanted
– added.
gosh/Twitter
Source: wPolityce
Emma Matthew is a political analyst for “Social Bites”. With a keen understanding of the inner workings of government and a passion for politics, she provides insightful and informative coverage of the latest political developments.