Santa Moderna vs. San Pfizer

No time to read?
Get a summary

Humanity will not be spared the guilt of raising an obvious and deadly epidemic to the level of religion. The least opposition was crushed, support had to be blinded, regardless of attacks on freedoms in the name of covid. Superstitious pantomime has taken its place in the ranks of the altruistic NGOs of pharmaceutical companies, the biggest predators of the science market. San Pfizer, Santa Moderna, and other links in the saints persecuted vaccines not to increase their profits, but because they remained vigilant for people’s health. Imagine the bewilderment when the aforementioned saints face off in a brute case for patent theft when the second courts bring charges against the first.

Now that drugs are skinny, it’s time to remember that you can be a vaccine enthusiast, without forgetting that vaccines are business before medicine. Santa Moderna’s lawsuit against San Pfizer for copying “the latest technology” of messenger RNA has poisoned the covid oasis, and that’s just the beginning. Astrologers, also known as epidemiologists, who cannot get a single prediction about the emergence and decline of the coronavirus correct, must now decide with one voice which laboratory is God and which Beelzebub in order to cast them into hell. From that moment on, any person who expresses a reluctance to condemn will suffer more than they remember that it was Boris Johnson who first appeared before Putin.

In the unexpected break of the pandemic consensus, you’ll notice that this sad post has no comment on the lab where the mind has joined. He will scrupulously adhere to the dogma of the health authorities, because supporting the pharmacist, who was sanctified yesterday and demonized today, leads to jail for denial. And of course, the legal conflict has nothing to do with the 52 billion euros involved in the fall-winter season of fashion vaccines.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

An Elche crashed and sank (4-0)

Next Article

Sociologists have found that a third of people photograph their pets more often than children.