Since the position of this article seems contradictory, it would be appropriate to elaborate before we begin. The Finnish Prime Minister has accumulated so many responsibilities and privileges that it is inappropriate to broadcast it as a video at a party. Point and follow. Sanna Marin should never have accepted a drug test for the same reason, as it downplays her corporate role in the midst of a prior armed conflict with her Russian neighbor. If a Finn has any doubts about the pharmacological integrity of his senior leaders, don’t vote for him.
Fundamentalists of sincerity and spontaneity forget that there are protocols that bind a prime minister’s life together. A ruler is responsible for his image, which is intolerable to a normal citizen, for the same reasons that joining NATO allows him to decide the lives of his subjects, such as breaking centuries-old Finnish neutrality. It is hard to imagine that most of Sanna Marin’s compatriots would approve of her festive behavior, but the fundamental dilemma does not even require a collective scrutiny, resolved in a single question, will the Finnish prime minister attend a similar party tonight?
In fact, only the panic of losing her job explains Marin’s submission to the test, who must decide whether the video is purposely talking about cocaine. With this purifying decision, he not only broke the formal distance required by his position, but also caused great harm to the citizens of Europe. If a monarch has meekly yielded to narcotic scrutiny, who will try to evade Orwellian restraint.
In the days when drugs were a problem, it was said that doping tests should be done in parliaments, not in sports. The additional assumption that a ruler can verify himself without complexes in his spare time is interesting, provided that he subsequently undergoes a breathalyzer test. With his liberating power, the Prime Minister invented a new variant of the pharmacological passport.
In Spain, we have a very concrete example of what happens if a monarch’s private life is released, and those whose name is Juan Carlos I. Sanna Marin who support their outbursts with publicity, because he is responsible for the spread of the monarchy. The actions it intervenes in often coincide with those in favor of a dictatorial viral confinement, and highway officials get into vehicles before a crime has been discovered. In his bizarre interpretation, only prime ministers are masters of debauchery in their private spheres. As Karl Lagerfeld said, “only five percent of my time is my private life.”
Sanna Marin shouldn’t have risked her image at the party in question, let alone pass the blood purification test to avoid controversy. At this point, proponents of selective cleansing remember that comparing it to Boris Johnson is unfair, as the UK prime minister has gone into a pandemic frenzy. They omit that the Finnish prime minister has already apologized for starring in another disco night in the midst of covid and forgetting his official phone number after close contact. This is why acquitting some and blaming others precedes the spree of argument.
All countries would be better if their prime ministers worked from 10 am to 5 pm, but no one called a shirt-wearer a hypocrite when he knocked on the door as a rule of decency. All that remains is to refute the geostrategic argument that placed Putin behind his clumsy neighbor’s disqualification. This reference is made with remarkable lightness by fake hunters who never implied that the czar had overthrown Boris Johnson because he was the first to send his arsenal to Ukraine’s aid.