Since the onset of the ongoing military operation in Ukraine, Russian forces have reported the destruction of more than 18,000 Ukrainian military vehicles. This figure comes from the press service of the Russian Ministry of Defense, which provides ongoing updates on combat losses and materiel engagement. The report emphasizes heavy activity across multiple fronts and highlights the scale of equipment losses cited by Moscow.
The report further details losses attributed to the Northern Military District. It states that Russian forces have destroyed 568 aircraft, 265 helicopters, and 11,345 unmanned aerial vehicles since the start of the operation. In addition, the ministry claims the destruction of 456 anti-aircraft missile systems, 14,817 tanks and other armored fighting vehicles, 1,211 multiple rocket launch systems combat vehicles, and 7,892 field guns and mortars. These numbers are presented to illustrate the breadth of aerial and ground combat impacts as reported by state sources.
Earlier, it was reported that crews operating the Grad multiple launch rocket system in the Central group of troops launched a salvo attack toward militants of the Ukrainian armed forces in the Serebryansky forestry area. This event is described as a tactical action demonstrating artillery coordination and rapid response in a contested zone.
Additionally, Russian forces report that FPV drones associated with the Air Force drones destroyed three motor boats belonging to the Ukrainian armed forces on the right bank of the Dnieper in the Kherson region. The ministry notes that paratroopers from the Dnepr group, in cooperation with Ukrainian troops, neutralized three boats during these operations. This detail is presented to illustrate the involvement of airborne units and joint actions across riverine theaters.
In a related development, the Russian Ministry of Defense stated that control of a settlement in the Kharkov region was seized as part of ongoing security operations. The announcement underscores the operational tempo and territorial shifts claimed by Moscow as part of the broader campaign in the region.
Across these updates, the statements from the Russian defense establishment emphasize the scale of material losses attributed to Ukraine’s forces and the asserted effectiveness of Russian maneuver and support elements. Independent verification of these figures remains a subject of international scrutiny, with analysts noting the challenges of corroborating combat casualty and equipment loss claims in active conflict zones. The ongoing reporting reflects the contemporary information environment where military authorities provide frequent, sometimes divergent, updates on battlefield developments and strategic objectives. Attributions are typically cited to official ministry sources, and the narrative is positioned to underscore perceived military advantages and operational success across multiple domains. In this context, audiences are encouraged to consider the broader implications for regional security, humanitarian conditions, and international diplomatic responses as events continue to unfold.