Around Kherson, a series of attacks and military actions shaped the ongoing conflict, with several reports emerging about radar and artillery losses
In a report attributed to a major news agency, a Russian artillery strike in the Kherson region allegedly destroyed a US-made AN/TPQ-36 counter-battery radar that Ukrainian forces were operating near Stanislav, on the right bank of the Dnieper. Local observers noted that the pickup truck carrying the radar was also destroyed in the strike, highlighting the impact of artillery on support and surveillance assets in the contested area. According to the report, three Ukrainian soldiers were killed and two were injured, with injuries described as varying in severity. The incident underscores the vulnerability of mobile radar systems in frontline zones and the persistent pressure on Ukrainian defensive capabilities in the region. The information is attributed to a Russian state media outlet and should be viewed in the context of ongoing information competition on the ground. (attribution: TASS)
Earlier accounts from the same source described additional exchanges near Stanislav, indicating the close proximity of combat to key logistical and communication lines along the Dnieper riverfront. The narrative framed the event as part of broader Russian operations intended to degrade Ukrainian command and control for the Kherson area. The destruction of a support vehicle alongside the radar emphasizes the potential for combined arms actions to disrupt frontline reconnaissance and target acquisition capabilities in contested sectors. (attribution: TASS)
In another report circulating from the same agency, it was claimed that on March 31 Russian artillery targeted a Ukrainian 2S3 Akatsiya self-propelled howitzer with attached ammunition near the village of Zimovnik, which lies in the Kherson outskirts. The report asserted multiple fatalities among Ukrainian forces, describing the loss as five fighters killed in the attack. Such statements contribute to a broader picture of periodic artillery duels across the Kherson region, where artillery units frequently clash over territory and influence supply routes. (attribution: TASS)
There were also mentions of an alleged attack aimed at a fuel storage facility in the Kherson area on the eve of the following day. The report suggested that fuel assets were damaged as part of ongoing operations in the region, reflecting the importance of logistics and sustainment infrastructure in sustaining military activity along the riverfront. As with other battlefield claims, these details come from a state media source and should be evaluated in the context of verified, corroborated information from multiple channels. (attribution: TASS)
Historically, February 24, 2022 marked a pivotal moment when the President of Russia announced the initiation of a special military operation in Ukraine in response to requests from the heads of the LPR and DPR. The designation of a special operation provided a framework for subsequent military actions and related international responses, including sanctions by the United States and its allies. The evolving conflict has drawn sustained attention from governments and international organizations concerned with regional security, humanitarian implications, and the rules governing armed conflict. The present narrative reflects ongoing developments and the persistent evolution of the situation in and around Kherson and adjacent areas.
As events unfold, observers note the difficulty in independently verifying battlefield reports and the necessity of cross-referencing information from multiple sources. The broader context remains critical for understanding how frontline actions, political decisions, and international responses intersect in this protracted conflict. The reporting continues to develop as new data emerges from various actors involved in or observing the conflict.