A recent study featured in Science Developments presents a notably hopeful perspective on how the planet responds to warming, thanks to more realistic ecological models. These models indicate that vegetation may absorb greater amounts of atmospheric CO2 than previously estimated.
Even so, the researchers behind the work were quick to caution that governments should not ease their efforts to cut emissions or slow down conservation. Planting more trees and safeguarding existing forests remain important, but they are not silver bullets. The study reinforces the wide range of benefits that conservation can deliver.
Jürgen Knauer, who led the Hawkesbury Environment Institute team at the University of Western Sydney, explains that the findings contribute to global climate predictions used by major bodies such as the IPCC. The new model envisions stronger, more sustainable carbon uptake through the end of the century by accounting for key processes that govern how plants perform photosynthesis.
Knauer notes that the model highlights three essential mechanisms that influence a forest’s capacity to store carbon and that these factors are often underrepresented in broader climate models. It examines how efficiently carbon dioxide moves inside leaves, how plants adapt to changing temperatures, and how plants allocate resources to grow in shaded conditions. These mechanisms are critical for understanding how well photosynthesis can help steady the carbon balance.
Photosynthesis is the process by which plants capture CO2 from the air and convert it into sugars needed for growth and metabolism. This natural uptake of carbon helps mitigate climate change by reducing atmospheric CO2 levels.
Yet climate change poses a challenge: rising temperatures and more frequent droughts could eventually limit how much carbon vegetation can absorb. The exact long-term response of ecosystems to such conditions remains uncertain, given their abundance and the evolving environment.
Experts warn that severe climate shifts could weaken the carbon-sequestering capacity of terrestrial ecosystems, particularly if droughts intensify and heat waves become more common.
In the current study, Knauer and colleagues evaluated how vegetation would respond to a high-emissions scenario by the century’s end, testing several versions of the model with varying levels of complexity. Some versions ignored critical physiological mechanisms, while the most comprehensive version incorporated all three major processes driving photosynthesis.
Analyzing photosynthesis
The results were clear: the most sophisticated models, which include up-to-date plant physiology, predict stronger increases in the global carbon uptake by vegetation.
Silvia Caldararu, Associate Professor at Trinity School of Natural Sciences, contributed to the discussion by framing these findings in the broader context of biosphere models. She explains that many models have underestimated the role of certain biological mechanisms and may not fully capture vegetation’s resilience under climate stress. The implication is that the impacts of climate change on vegetation could be greater than previously thought.
Researchers stress that climate models are not just about physics. Biology plays a central part, and this should be reflected in projections. Such insights are relevant for nature-based strategies to combat climate change, including reforestation, and for estimating how much carbon those actions might absorb over longer periods.
While the findings suggest potential benefits from planting and protecting forests, experts caution that these measures alone will not fix everything. Reducing emissions across sectors remains essential, and trees cannot offer a quick, universal fix.
Reference work: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh9444
………………
Contact information for the environmental department has been removed.