A Ukrainian family of nine faces eviction after shelter hosts ask them to leave
A Ukrainian family of nine who found refuge in England faced homelessness when the couple who had offered them shelter in a bungalow requested they vacate. The report began with coverage in a widely read tabloid and outlines the dispute that followed.
The account details how a Royal Navy officer and his wife, who had welcomed the family during a troubled period, later cut off internet access and delivered a formal notice through their attorney ordering the family to move out. Hampshire County Council reportedly issued a similar notice, creating a legal and practical gap that left the group with nowhere to stay and limited options for arranging the next steps. The story notes a direct translation used to clarify details in reporting.
Olga Maxim and her husband, along with their nine companions, remembered the warmth of their initial reception. The bungalow had felt like a temporary sanctuary amid upheaval. Over time, lines of communication ceased, and an eviction letter arrived with a specific departure date. The deadline of July 15 intensified the pressure to relocate and the challenge of unreliable internet access that hindered contact with friends, supporters, or potential landlords. The head of the Maxim family described the owner as distant and unapproachable, a sentiment echoed by others following coverage of the case in public discourse.
The law firm Trethowans, representing the family in the eviction process, declined to comment further that afternoon, directing inquiries back to the clients. The lack of official statements leaves several questions unanswered while the family weighs its options and seeks a stable living situation for the children involved.
Inside the household are five children aged between one and seven, including at least one child with autism. The mothers of both spouses, aged sixty and seventy respectively, accompanied the family from Ukraine and require ongoing care. What began as a compassionate act of hospitality has devolved into a housing crisis that affects not only the adults but the children who depend on routine and a secure home environment.
Girik, the family head, spoke with several local real estate agents about their situation. He explained that when he told agents they were a nine-person Ukrainian family, hesitation and occasional refusals followed. Some agents even disconnected the call rather than engaging further. This illustrates the real obstacles larger families can face in finding affordable, immediate housing in a market where demand can outpace supply and timing matters greatly.
The officer who offered shelter is reported to have served in the Royal Navy for twenty years and to have participated in campaigns in the Gulf region and Afghanistan, contributing to the safety of the royal household. Attempts to reach him for comment or clarification about the change in housing arrangements were unsuccessful, leaving the public with incomplete information about his role or the reasons behind the eviction. The absence of direct statements makes it harder to understand the situation and what steps might resolve the housing gap for the family involved.
With the eviction deadline approaching, the Maxim family has launched a fundraising effort to secure a new home and create a stable environment for the children. Community support is crucial in helping families facing sudden displacement find a safe, long-term solution. As the family navigates this period, supporters hope for a resolution that preserves the dignity and safety of all members involved.
The story has drawn reactions from political figures and commentators discussing the broader implications of hosting refugees. Recent remarks have highlighted questions about responsibility, resources, and the political dimensions of refugee reception. These discussions reflect the ongoing tension between extending humanitarian hospitality and managing the practical realities of large, temporary settlements. In this light, the Ukrainian family’s experience stands as a small example of a wider conversation about support, resilience, and the paths to stability for displaced families in transitional moments.
There has been no official statement confirming or denying the specific claims about funding, communication breakdowns, or the exact legal basis for the eviction. Observers emphasize the importance of clear guidance for host households and the role of local councils in coordinating support services for refugees and other vulnerable residents. The broader takeaway centers on ensuring that aid, shelter, and legal options remain accessible so families can regain their footing and move toward a secure future, even when obstacles arise.