In the middle of the Saudi Arabian desert rises a colossal project named The Line, a sprawling corridor of development where machines, cranes, and a vast workforce press forward on the arid sands. The vision, already described in local reports, is a linear city stretching 170 kilometers in length, 200 meters in width, and rising about 500 meters. Promoters present the plan as a model of sustainability, a bold statement meant to redefine urban living without traditional metropolitan sprawl.
Yet questions linger about true sustainability and the environmental footprint of such a project. Architect Luis Lope de Toledo, whose YouTube channel covers these topics, has produced a detailed analysis focusing on environmental impact and livability. His assessment labels The Line as utopian and impractical, challenging its claim to be genuinely sustainable given the scale and complexity involved.
The design includes a wall entirely clad in reflective mirrors. The intent is striking, but it raises concerns about wildlife and local ecosystems. Lope de Toledo notes that birds in the area might struggle with the mirrored facade, potentially altering migration routes or suffering injuries from window collisions. The sheer scale of the reflective skin could mask the structure from natural habitats and disrupt ecological patterns for a broad area.
(Photo caption) Recreation of the last portion of the building.
Questions about the project’s sustainability extend beyond wildlife interactions. Crown prince Mohammed bin Salman has highlighted a zero-carbon ambition once the city is operational. Critics, including the architect cited, point to the substantial embodied carbon that construction would generate. The argument is that initial emissions could outweigh any future environmental benefits the city might offer once complete.
CO2 emissions are a focal point of the debate. Some observers, including Philip Oldfield, director of a renowned environmental institute in Sydney, argue that building a 500-meter-tall structure with low-carbon materials would demand extraordinary amounts of steel, glass, and concrete. Estimates suggest the construction could account for billions of tonnes of embodied carbon, comparable to several years of emissions from large economies.
One claimed sustainability feature is the absence of cars inside The Line. Promoters assert that everything is reachable within a five-minute walk, supported by a 170-kilometer rail line designed to run from one end to the other. However, actual performance figures raise questions. Some calculations suggest achieving a 20-minute traversal would require rail speeds well beyond current capabilities, possibly exceeding 550 kilometers per hour, even without intermediate stops. Real-world race times and achievable technologies will determine whether the promise can be met.
Another critical issue is the building’s skin. The high walls might become hot and oppressive without adequate ventilation, prompting the need for extensive climate control. If the exterior is too reflective or airtight, cooling systems could become the default solution, undermining the sustainability claim. A porous skin that allows airflow could be a viable alternative, but it would require careful engineering to balance comfort with energy use.
All this suggests significant reliance on air conditioning and ventilation technologies, which again complicates the sustainability narrative. The video discussion also touches on water supply—large quantities would be necessary to support residents and irrigate the visible greenery in virtual renderings. The proposed plan leans on desalination plants powered by solar energy, yet several experts remain skeptical about the viability of renewable energy at this scale and the reliability of freshwater provisioning for a city of this magnitude.
Work currently underway focuses on ground preparation, with heavy equipment involved in leveling the site for the initial phase. Reports from local press indicate the scale of activity is enormous, with thousands of piles driven into the ground and daily progress measured in sheer numbers of structural supports. While visible progress is slow to appear, the site remains a hive of activity as engineers and planners map out next steps.
Ultimately, the debate around The Line centers on whether a mega-urban project can reconcile ambition with ecological responsibility. Proponents argue that benefits in space efficiency, travel times, and reduced car dependence could transform how cities function. Critics counter that the environmental costs and engineering uncertainties may overshadow any prospective gains, at least in the near term. The discussion continues as researchers, policymakers, and communities weigh the trade-offs inherent in such a transformative undertaking.
…