A special prosecutor’s office has filed charges in a case still under review, seeking a sentence of permanent imprisonment for a man accused of killing his wife and injuring others. The defendants face a broad range of accusations, including murder, manslaughter, unauthorized abortion, and chronic abuse. Along with the potential life sentence, prosecutors are seeking full compensation totaling 230,000 euros for the relatives of the victims.
According to the written conclusions provided by lawyer Isabel Fluxà, the events are described as taking place on the night of May 16, 2021, inside a family home on Tomás de Sa Pobla street in Santa Catalina. After a confrontation between the couple, the suspect, Muhammed Kouch, allegedly struck his partner Warda Ouchene multiple times and then strangled her, resulting in her death while she was pregnant. The fetus did not survive the tragedy. The same individual is accused of killing his six-year-old son by strangling him. The prosecution states that both victims were attacked within the family residence before the alleged killings, underscoring a pattern of violence that extended to the entire household.
The suspect is said to have left the home after the crimes and locked the door to prevent entry. The following night, he reportedly contacted security guards to report the deaths. It is claimed he confessed to police that he had killed his wife and son and was subsequently arrested in Palm. Reports indicate that, shortly before his arrest, he sent a message to his wife’s brother describing the outcome and the location where the bodies were found. These details are included to illustrate the sequence of events as presented by the prosecution and are referenced here to provide context for public understanding of the case, highlighting the alleged timeline and the gravity of the acts described by authorities.
The special prosecutor’s office emphasizes a documented history of violence during the years the couple lived together at the Sa Pobla residence. The defendant is described as having repeatedly subjected his partner and the partner’s child to physical and verbal abuse on multiple occasions. There is said to be a clear pattern of gender-based violence preceding the crimes, noted as part of the evidentiary record. This background is presented to help explain the seriousness of the charges and the considerations that may influence judicial decisions in the forthcoming proceedings. In summary, prosecutors portray a case marked by repeated episodes of coercion and harm that culminated in a fatal outcome for all involved, including a fetus, a six-year-old child, and the partner, underscoring the perceived severity of the alleged acts.
Legal observers note that the case will hinge on the evaluation of testimonies, forensic findings, and the timeline of events within the family home. The court is expected to weigh the alleged history of abuse against the resulting fatalities, while the defense may challenge aspects of the prosecution’s narrative or the interpretation of evidence. The upcoming judicial phase will determine whether the charges lead to a conviction and what penalties may be imposed under applicable criminal law statutes in the jurisdiction where the case is being heard. The process will also consider how the evidence aligns with established legal standards for intent, causation, and the protection of vulnerable individuals within intimate relationships.
As the matter progresses, officials and the public will await further disclosures from the investigation, including additional documentation of the incidents and any new developments in the prosecutorial strategy. The case remains a focal point for discussions about domestic violence, the protection of vulnerable family members, and the efficacy of legal provisions designed to address severe harm within intimate relationships. The proceedings will also be observed for potential implications on related cases in the region, where similar patterns of violence have been alleged in other domestic settings, prompting renewed conversations about prevention, support services, and law enforcement responses.
The information presented here reflects the summarization of official filings and public statements from the prosecutors’ office and counsel involved in the case. All details are subject to judicial review and formal court proceedings as the case advances through the legal system, with ongoing updates anticipated as investigations unfold.