Authorities from the private security service of the Main Directorate of the Russian Guards detained a person who appeared to be in disguise in Domodedovo, a city near Moscow. The incident involved a threat to blow up the building housing the military registration and enlistment office, according to reports cited by TASS and other power structures. The tense situation unfolded in the early hours when security teams were alerted to a suspect on Dolgu Street, a location within the city limits.
Witnesses described a person wearing a military-style uniform who approached the military enlistment office with paperwork in hand. The individual drew immediate attention from staff and security personnel who monitor entrances and exits for the registration process. Early statements indicated that the person carried an object resembling a small explosive device of the type F-1, a detail that raised alarms about a possible imminent threat.
An official source quoted by TASS noted that the person threatened to trigger an explosion in the building devoted to military registration and enlistment. In the minutes that followed, responders moved to assess the danger and determine whether the item was real or a replica. Specialists on the scene worked diligently to verify the status of the claimed ammunition and to ensure public safety in the surrounding area.
As a precaution, traffic around the detention zone was limited to prevent interference with the ongoing security operation. Law enforcement agencies coordinated closely with the security service to manage access and maintain order while investigators conducted their assessment. The objective was to resolve the potential risk quickly and with minimal disruption to nearby residents and essential services.
Within hours, a clarification from the Central District press service of the Russian Guards was shared. It was announced that the object initially described as a grenade turned out to be a dummy device, a puppet intended to mislead observers rather than a live explosive. This clarification helped to ease immediate public concern and allowed investigators to continue gathering information about the incident and the individual involved.
In related coverage, a Telegram channel reported another development from Kursk. It claimed that a young man with a prior conviction was seen discarding a grenade from a fifth-floor window in an attempt to obstruct police investigation. The report suggested that a large area, including a garden, was cordoned off by authorities to preserve safety while officers pursued leads and verified the information. Authorities emphasized the importance of securing locations where explosive devices might be perceived, even when initial reports later prove to be mistaken.
The events in Domodedovo illustrate how security services respond to potential threats at critical civic sites. In such situations, the priority is to protect civilians, verify the legitimacy of any alleged weapon, and determine the intent of the person involved while keeping the public informed through official channels. The incident also underscores the need for heightened vigilance around military and government facilities, where even a perceived risk can trigger swift responses from specialized security teams. Ongoing investigations aim to establish the exact sequence of events, identify any accomplices, and assess whether the person acted alone or under some form of duress or coercion. Investigators will review surveillance footage, interview witnesses, and coordinate with local authorities to ensure a complete and accurate account of what occurred. Public safety measures, including temporary traffic restrictions, were lifted once the immediate threat was ruled out and the individual was safely detained. The broader takeaway remains clear: when security structures detect unusual behavior near sensitive sites, rapid assessment, clear communication, and coordinated action are essential to preventing harm and maintaining trust in public safety protocols.