sabotage case

No time to read?
Get a summary

Sergei Korolev began his design career in aircraft development, studying under Andrei Tupolev and completing his diploma in 1929 with Tupolev guiding his work. The spark to build rockets came later, inspired by the ideas of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky. In 1931, on Korolev’s initiative, a Jet Propulsion Working Group took shape in Moscow. There, he helped launch GIRD-10, a miniature liquid-fueled rocket, the first of its kind in the Soviet Union.

From that point, Korolev contributed to various projects at the Jet Research Institute of NK VMD of the USSR. He developed several flight prototypes for anti-aircraft and cruise missiles and worked on a long-range ballistic missile concept. None of these initiatives matured into completed systems, and Korolev shifted toward a rocket-powered interceptor until his arrest in 1938.

Like many others during a brutal era, Korolev faced repression. One evening his wife returned home to news of two suspicious men at the entrance. Korolev, calm and pragmatic, suggested listening to the folk songs he had purchased that day as a way to pass the time. A midnight knock soon followed, and the search continued until early morning. This terrifying sequence reflected a broader pattern: the Jet Institute, later known as NII-3, experienced widespread arrests linked to the purge of top military technicians following Marshal Mikhail Tukhachevsky’s execution in 1937. Other leading rocket scientists—Ivan Kleimenov, Georgy Langemak, and Valentin Glushko—were detained as the climate of accusations intensified. Korolev was officially charged with sabotage on September 27, 1938, according to interrogation records.

With working notes focused solely on rocket science and lacking evidence of espionage, many hoped Korolev could defend himself against the charges. The methods used by the NKVD to extract confessions are well documented, though specifics about Korolev’s treatment remain less public. According to family recollections, the first interrogation involved being asked whether he understood the reason for his arrest; his reply was, in essence, that he did not. A harsh confrontation followed, including humiliation and physical intimidation, which intensified the ordeal. The interrogation continued despite medical concerns, underscoring the brutal environment of the time.

Korolev never published memoirs or spoke openly about his prison years. What is known about this period comes largely from relatives and colleagues who survived the era and later recounted their memories. Within the NKVD interrogations, a recurring pattern emerged, described by Glushko as a conveyor belt of relentless questioning and pressure. Interrogators employed threats, insults, often resorting to coercive measures that left deep marks on those subjected to them. Eventually, Korolev and others from the Jet Institute were labeled as dangerous enemies of the state, facing severe penalties. He was transferred to the Military Collegium for trial, and while many in this category faced execution, he received a sentence of ten years in a forced labor camp, a turn of events that would shape the course of his life and career.

In the camp, Korolev was rescued by a political prisoner airman

To regain his strength, Korolev was sent to a remote mining camp in the Maldyak region, far from the political center. The journey through the caravan routes and sea transfers exposed him to brutal conditions, including overcrowded transports and harsh environmental exposure. The daily routine, the long hours, and the relentless exposure to the cold tested the limits of endurance. Yet the disciplined regimen of daily exercise helped him maintain a degree of resilience that surprised his fellow prisoners, and his commitment to health stood out in a place where mortality was high. Survival depended on a mixture of luck, stubborn will, and the occasional act of mercy from those who controlled the harsh environment.

As the investigation into the crash of pilot Valery Chkalov’s plane unfolded, Mikhail Usachev, a factory manager, ended up in the same camp on charges of negligence. Usachev, noted for his athleticism and stubborn resolve, quickly established authority among other inmates. During a crucial moment of transition, Usachev discovered Korolev in a state of severe weakness among a pile of ragged clothes and inmates. The headman ordered care for the prisoner and the distribution of rations, and a simple decoction of raw potatoes and pine needles aided against scurvy, helping Korolev regain some strength. This unlikely act of mercy from a rival eventually reshaped the future, as Usachev later joined Korolev’s team and contributed to his rehabilitation as a key engineer in the rocket program.

Korolev’s daughter later noted a lasting sense of gratitude toward those who had helped him while he was imprisoned. In the early 1960s, while overseeing the council of chief designers in the rocket and space sector, Korolev invited Usachev to serve as deputy chief engineer at the pilot plant, a testament to how personal loyalties and professional respect could endure even through years of oppression. Korolev’s family and supporters, including prominent aviators, continued to advocate for him while he navigated the complex political landscape of the time. After a challenging year in the mines, Korolev was shifted back to Moscow, nearly succumbing to scurvy and losing teeth from the harsh conditions. His subsequent retrial in 1940 led to an eight-year prison sentence and a transfer to the NKVD’s special facility known as TsKB29, affectionately dubbed Tupolev Sharaga. There he reunited with his former teacher Tupolev and began working again on the Soviet Pe-2 and Tu-2 bombers. The climate at Sharaga was better than in the mines, and while it remained a prison, it was less brutal than the worst camps. Korolev’s release came in 1944, a turning point that allowed him to resume shaping the future of Soviet aviation and rocketry.

Survivor Chief Designer

Korolev’s most influential achievement is the R-7 family of missiles, the foundation of later space exploration efforts. The initial versions served military purposes, but the liquid-fueled design proved less than ideal for delivering nuclear weapons. Yet the same technology evolved into the rockets that carried Sputnik-1, the first satellite, Yuri Gagarin, the first human in space, and Luna-9, which achieved the first successful lunar landing. The lineage of these systems continues with modern iterations like Soyuz-2, which traces its roots to the same “seven” platform. This progression marked a shift from battlefield rockets to vehicles capable of carrying humans and payloads beyond Earth’s atmosphere.

Korolev’s leadership in the Soviet space program earned wide recognition. His talent as an engineer was clear, but it was his leadership, bold decision-making, and the ability to mobilize teams to pursue ambitious goals that set him apart. The result was a period in which the USSR achieved the first satellite, the first cosmonaut, and early lunar exploration milestones that defined the era. On March 16, 1966, Korolev died at age 59 from rectal sarcoma. The medical team attempted abdominal surgery, but anesthesia complications and a difficult airway led to a fatal outcome. A physician later remarked that the strain from earlier interrogations may have contributed to his condition, underscoring the lasting impact of those years on his health. The loss was profound for the space program and for a generation that saw in Korolev the embodiment of national aspiration in spaceflight.

Beyond healing and strategy, Korolev dreamed of sending people to Mars. His influence helped shape discussions about expanding beyond the Moon, and his authority gave him a platform to advocate for future projects. Some historians argue that had he lived longer, a different course for the Soviet lunar program might have emerged, perhaps altering the trajectory of space exploration. As one contemporary observer noted, few figures rivaled Korolev in talent, organizational ability, and leadership. After his passing, his portrait began to appear in newspapers, and a 1972 film about the pioneers of astronautics, titled Taming of Fire, drew on his life as a source of inspiration, even though some fictionalizations existed in popular depictions. The enduring legacy is not only in the machines he helped create but in the persistent, stubborn belief that a single designer could shape an era of exploration.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Football Exchange Overview

Next Article

Polestar 3: U.S. debut, specs, and features for the electric crossover