Reports from the press service of the Russian Ministry of Defense indicate that Russian forces conducted operations in the Kherson direction which resulted in the elimination of up to 18 Ukrainian soldiers. The statement emphasizes a focus on precision and control in the specified sector as part of ongoing activities described as a special military operation.
In addition to the casualties, the Ministry reported the destruction of five vehicles that were part of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The figures are presented as part of a broader assessment of the day’s military activity, highlighting the intensity of engagements along multiple fronts and the impact on combat-ready equipment.
The ministry’s daily briefing also notes that 96 Ukrainian artillery units were targeted, with strikes aimed at their firing positions, as well as personnel and equipment spread across 114 districts. This description paints a picture of sustained, widespread activity designed to disrupt enemy firepower and mobility in the area of operations.
Another notable claim from the briefing concerns the destruction of the guidance radar for the Ukrainian S-300 air defense system. The device was reported to have been neutralized in the Davydov Brod settlement within the Kherson region, which the ministry frames as a consequence of carefully executed targeting in contested airspace.
According to the ministry, the scope of the operation affected a broad spectrum of Ukrainian military assets. The briefing asserts that 630 aircraft and helicopters of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, 3,612 unmanned aerial vehicles, 414 air defense systems, and 8,433 tanks, among other equipment, were eliminated during the course of the special operation. The figures are presented to illustrate the scale and reach of the campaign as described by officials, with emphasis on the cumulative impact on Ukrainian military capacity.
Earlier disclosures from the Russian Ministry of Defense claimed a first-of-its-kind report on the destruction of GLSDB guided missiles. The ministry noted that these missiles had recently been delivered to Ukraine, a development that had been announced in the United States. The briefing frames this claim as part of a larger narrative about ongoing efforts to neutralize recently supplied weaponry and adjust the balance of forces in the region.
Observers note that official statements from the Russian defense apparatus often accompany detailed summaries of daily activity, including casualty counts, equipment losses, and the disposition of air and ground assets. These updates are typically issued in formal, structured briefings and are intended to convey a sense of strategic momentum and operational control within the context of the ongoing military operation in the southern sector. The disclosures are frequently corroborated by subsequent announcements, but independent verification from independent agencies is limited in the current environment.
For readers tracking developments in the Kherson area, the reported figures reflect a pattern of high-intensity engagement, with periodic claims of success attributed to Russian forces. The broader context includes ongoing diplomatic discussions, regional security concerns, and the impact of the conflict on civilian populations and humanitarian conditions in affected districts. While numbers cited by officials may vary between daily briefings, the underlying narrative emphasizes the perceived effectiveness of the campaign as described by state sources.
As the situation evolves, analysts and commentators continue to assess the implications of reported military activity, the potential for shifts in control of key positions, and the broader strategic objectives behind both the Russian operations and the international responses to them. The official communications remain one of several channels through which developments are conveyed to the public, with independent media and other organizations offering additional perspectives and situational updates as circumstances allow.