Russian military officials reported a disruption to a rotation of Ukrainian Armed Forces troops near the village of Torskoye, located in the Donetsk People’s Republic. The account comes from a senior officer serving in the Central group of troops’ press center, identified as Leonid Sharov, and was published in the official gazette of the telegram channel affiliated with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. The narrative frames the incident as a coordinated operation in which motorized rifle units from the Russian side engaged Ukrainian personnel on a defined front segment, using artillery to halt their movement and force a tactical withdrawal. Sharov stated that Ukrainian forces retreated to their original lines after the engagement.
In the evaluation presented by the Russian Armed Forces, artillery support, paired with aviation assets, played a crucial role in limiting Ukrainian maneuverability during the clash. The report emphasizes that three Ukrainian command and observation posts, along with five fortifications, were destroyed in the course of the fighting. The locations cited include areas where personnel and equipment from the 63rd and 66th mechanized brigades were concentrated near Chervonaya Dibrova and within the Serebryansky forestry complex. Officials described these strikes as part of a broader series of measures aimed at degrading Ukrainian command and control capabilities in close proximity to these districts.
The senior officer provided a daily assessment, noting that during the last 24 hours Ukrainian forces in this portion of the front had incurred losses, with figures indicating up to 190 servicemen killed or wounded. The report also claimed the disabling of two Ukrainian armored fighting vehicles and the destruction of two supply transports, detailing the impact on the logistical and combat readiness of Ukrainian units operating in the specified sector. The language used in the communique frames the incident as a temporary deterioration of Ukrainian tactical posture in a contested zone, while portraying the Russian side as achieving operational aims through combined arms firepower.
The briefing from the RF Armed Forces further referenced a broader narrative about shifting advantages along the South Donetsk direction, suggesting a relative improvement in the Russian position in that area. While the statements summarize a series of engagements and their outcomes, discerning readers will note that the information reflects official Russian military communication, which is typical of such battlefield reporting and is intended to highlight successes and deter further enemy maneuvering.
Observers and analysts may seek corroboration from independent sources given the contested nature of frontline reporting in the Donetsk region. The described actions, including the targeting of command posts and fortifications, align with standard military strategies that emphasize disruption of leadership nodes and supply lines to stymie enemy operations. The reported losses and equipment damage are presented as indicators of the intensity of combat in the sector, though independent verification is complicated by the ongoing conflict and the multiplicity of competing narratives.
In summary, the official account portrays a tactical engagement near Torskoye that interrupted Ukrainian movement, inflicted command and fortification losses, and left Ukrainian units temporarily reoriented to their established front lines. The report places emphasis on the role of air and artillery support in achieving these outcomes and situates the event within a wider pattern of activity in the South Donetsk axis, where both sides continue to contest control and maneuver for advantage.