The official representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Major General Igor Konashenkov, reported that Russian artillery and missile forces engaged and neutralized 28 Ukrainian artillery units along with their equipment in a single day. He provided a detailed account of the strikes, highlighting both the scale and the precision of the actions conducted by Russian firepower across multiple fronts.
In Konashenkov’s briefing, a Smerch multiple launch rocket system was destroyed near the village of Berezovka, underscoring the continued emphasis on limiting Ukraine’s long-range conventional artillery capabilities. The notification stressed that Russian forces succeeded in degrading an important mixed arsenal position, stressing the impact on Ukrainian firepower consolidation in the area.
The Major General also asserted that Russian air defense systems intercepted and shot down five Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles in the airspace near Ruska Lozova, Pitomnik, and Izyum in the Kharkiv region. He added that another drone was eliminated over Snake Island, signaling ongoing efforts to contest Ukrainian aerial reconnaissance and air mobility operations close to contested coastal and border areas.
According to the report, Russian artillery damaged and destroyed a Tochka-U ballistic missile near Khleborob, as well as three Smerch shells near the village of Kamenka in the Kharkiv region. These claims illustrate the ongoing, high-intensity artillery engagements that have characterized the recent phase of the conflict, with a focus on disrupting Ukrainian forces’ command, control, and fire support capabilities.
On the political front, it is noted that February 24 marked a decision by the Russian leadership to undertake a military special operation in response to requests for assistance from the heads of the Lugansk People’s Republic and the Donetsk People’s Republic. The stated objective was to protect the civilian populations and the broader security interests within the Donbass region, a description that has framed subsequent developments and international discussions surrounding the operation.
Observers note that the decision to initiate the operation had wide-reaching implications, including the imposition of new sanctions by the United States and some of its allies. These diplomatic responses have been part of a broader, ongoing dialogue about regional security, defense postures, and humanitarian considerations in areas affected by the conflict. The information provided by official channels continues to shape the public understanding of these events, though independent verification and corroboration from multiple sources is often sought by observers and analysts worldwide.
In ongoing briefings, state-affiliated media outlets and official spokespeople emphasize the rhythm of confrontations along the front lines, the tempo of artillery exchanges, and the asserted effectiveness of Russia’s air defense and precision strike capabilities. While such updates offer a view into the operational picture as presented by the Russian side, they are typically complemented by independent reporting, satellite imagery, and on-the-ground assessments from various international actors who monitor the situation from different perspectives, contributing to a broader, multifaceted narrative about the conflict.