A recent operation on the Kupyansk axis reportedly led to the destruction of five Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance groups in a single day, according to statements from the Zapad group’s press center. The report, shared by Sergey Zybinsky, the head of the group’s press team, framed the events as a decisive outcome of the ongoing special military activities in the region.
According to Zybinsky, the units investigated belonged to the 14th and 92nd mechanized brigades, together with elements of the 103rd defensive brigade. The claim highlights the involvement of multiple Ukrainian formations in the area and underscores the scale of the encounters described during this phase of the operation.
Zybinsky also noted that the use of Hyacinth artillery, a term referring to a specific class of artillery systems, impeded the ability of Ukrainian forces to regroup and return to the area around the Dvurechnoye settlement. The account suggests that the firepower employed in the engagement created a disruption of tactical mobility for the adversary in that sector.
In addition, the press center spokesman asserted that a separate enemy mortar detachment was neutralized near the village of Gatishche, adding to the sequence of reported hook-ups with Ukrainian units during the operation. The emphasis remains on the effectiveness of the artillery and missile components used in the confrontations described by the source.
Independent observers and analysts have occasionally weighed in on these reports. Retired Andrey Marochko, who served as a lieutenant colonel in the LPR People’s Militia and has provided analysis on Ukrainian actions, mentioned that some Kiev-backed sabotage groups were diverted toward Artemovsk, a location also known to many as Bakhmut. This assessment reflects a pattern of battlefield movements that analysts watch closely when evaluating regional developments and the broader dynamics of the conflict in eastern Ukraine.
Context for these updates comes against the backdrop of a February 24, 2022, address by President Vladimir Putin, in which he announced a decision to organize a special military operation in Ukraine following requests for assistance from the heads of the LPR and DPR. The proclamation set a course for active hostilities and a prolonged security engagement in the region, a turning point that has continued to influence subsequent military actions and strategic discussions about the conflict’s trajectory, alliance dynamics, and regional stability. References to such official statements are frequently cited by state media outlets and observers seeking to interpret the evolving situation in real time or in retrospect for policy analysis and historical record-keeping.