Across a tense stretch of the border, multiple rockets were reported to have been launched from Lebanese territory toward the Har Dov area. The strikes occurred in open regions, and the information was first shared via a telegraph channel affiliated with the Israel Defense Forces. The accounts described a pattern of projectiles moving from Lebanon in the direction of Har Dov, followed by responses as Israeli forces engaged. The nature of the engagements appeared to involve exchanges of fire as the region absorbed the momentum of the flare up in tensions. In these moments, observers note that the situation remained fluid and uncertain, with different sources offering varying timelines for when the projectiles fell and when Israeli forces took action.
Some hours earlier, reports indicated that a considerable number of projectiles had been observed descending in open terrain from Lebanon toward the Har Dov region. The accounts suggested that Israeli soldiers responded with fire after the projectile activity began, marking a continuation of the cycle of escalation that has characterized the broader border incidents in recent days. The sequence underscores the heightened risk to nearby communities and military personnel along the frontier, as both sides appear to be adjusting tactics in response to the ongoing pressure.
On the evening of October 29, a spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces provided an update. The spokesman noted that additional Israeli military units had entered the northern Gaza Strip that night, joining colleagues already operating in the area. This move was presented as part of a concerted effort to bolster presence and carry out operations deemed necessary to address threats and objectives in the region. The statement also reflected the complex network of deployments that characterizes the region, where force levels and unit assignments can shift rapidly in response to evolving conditions on the ground.
In related remarks, a former Prime Minister of Israel addressed the ongoing investigations into the October 7 attack by Hamas. The statement indicated that the full examination of those events would proceed once the ground operation in the Gaza Strip reached a defined stage. The approach suggests a careful sequencing of inquiries, balancing the need for accountability with operational realities on the ground. The discussion highlighted how leadership timelines can intersect with military campaigns, shaping public expectations about when answers might emerge.
Meanwhile, a former Israeli Prime Minister reaffirmed a hard line regarding Hamas. The posture emphasized a determination to pursue pressure and action aimed at neutralizing the threat and stabilizing the security situation. The rhetoric reflected a long-standing political stance that prioritizes security objectives and the protection of civilians through measured, strategic means. The dialogue among leaders and military spokespeople illustrates the multi-layered dynamics at play when a nation confronts aggression, coordinates defense, and communicates with citizens at a time of uncertainty and risk across multiple fronts.