The investigation into the death and alleged fraud of a Gran Canaria figure has prompted a wide-ranging inquiry by national authorities. Police sources confirm that the case centers on a man known locally as Gran Canaria, Rayco Xerach Antúnez Cazorla, whose body was found on a Tuesday evening at his residence in La Mancha, Ciudad Real. The incident drew immediate attention as investigators from the National Police began examining the circumstances surrounding the death, while officials from the Forensic Police and the forensic authority conducted a technical inspection at the scene. The Madrid No. 13 Exam Court is overseeing inquiries into alleged fraud that spanned several public and private institutions, including universities, administrators, and companies involved in education, publishing, and event management. The case has already become a focal point in regional and national coverage as authorities piece together the chain of events and assess the implications for those connected to the allegations.
Born in the Schamann district of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, the individual in question began his career in public service after completing compulsory education. He later joined the armed forces and, in 2005, became part of the Civil Guard. By 2013, he had shifted toward entrepreneurship in the education and hospitality sectors, establishing ventures with facilities in Triana. Reports from associates suggest these ventures faced financial challenges, yet they formed the basis for his later activities in leadership training and related initiatives. A move to New York followed, and in 2015 he founded Hispanic American College, an organization positioned as a high-level training center for Hispanic leaders. The claim of international work and influence then grew into a broader narrative about his professional identity.
In terms of his professional standing, some accounts describe him as a professor of leadership and social engagement at a university in the Murcia region. He reportedly held multiple honorary degrees and authored books that purportedly cemented his standing as a prominent figure among Hispanic professionals in the United States. These assertions circulated widely through interviews and public appearances, but investigative reporting later questioned their veracity.
There are also widely reported connections that purportedly linked him to former U.S. President Barack Obama. The narrative suggested that he recruited an adviser who had ties to the White House for a series of conferences in Murcia, catalyzing a business collaboration that culminated in an invitation to help organize a summit on technological innovation and circular economy. An image taken during a visit was later used to promote his advisory credentials, a move that sources close to the adviser contended misrepresented the extent of any direct relationship with the White House. Critics argued that the public perception of these ties was inflated and that the individual involved did not have established recognition in the United States.
As the legal process unfolded, Madrid’s Education Court No. 13 saw a roster of individuals brought into the case, with charges ranging from misappropriation of funds to allegations of obtaining investments for projects that never materialized. Some lenders reported substantial sums, including tens of thousands of euros, while others described loans that were never repaid as projects stalled due to economic disruptions. The defendants faced scrutiny for presenting a resume that others described as grandiose or exaggerated, with some investors accusing the subject of crafting a persona designed to attract money and influence. Despite these claims, the central figure consistently denied the allegations and asserted that business endeavors were hampered by external factors, including the pandemic. The courtroom narrative painted a stark contrast between perceived influence and the outcomes of the ventures involved.
In the months that followed, the individual remained a recognizable name in Ciudad Real, where local media noted his activities and community involvement. Reports highlighted his presence in the city, including efforts to donate masks and other essentials to residents in need during the health crisis. These acts of charity were part of a broader portrayal of a public life that mixed philanthropy with controversial business undertakings, leading to a complicated public image that drew both support and skepticism from different communities. The ongoing investigation continues to chart the connections between these activities and the broader allegations, with prosecutors and investigators pursuing a clear account of funds, contracts, and the actual impact of the projects involved.
The case remains under close scrutiny as authorities gather testimonies and documents to determine the truth of the various claims surrounding the subject’s career, affiliations, and the circumstances of the death. While some supporters describe the figure as a dynamic leader with a vision for education and civic engagement, others view the narrative as a cautionary tale about the dangers of self-promotion and overstatement in professional life. The investigation underscores the importance of accountability, especially when a public figure intertwines business ventures, public credibility, and community involvement in ways that invite intense scrutiny and potential legal consequences. As new details emerge, the public awaits a careful, evidence-based resolution that clarifies what happened and who may bear responsibility for the alleged misconduct.