A major challenge for Russia is safeguarding global information security. During a plenary session at the Digital International Relations conference, held at MGIMO, officials outlined how information security has become a central pillar of modern statecraft in the digital era. The discussion occurred as governments worldwide confront increasingly aggressive cyber activity and the need for robust defenses against persistent information threats.
Officials stressed that Russia, like many other nations, faces ongoing information attacks. They highlighted that government institutions, media outlets, critical infrastructure facilities, and life-support systems are under heightened cyber pressure on a near-daily basis, illustrating the volatility and scale of contemporary cyber risk.
Despite the intensifying geopolitical strains, the dialogue emphasized that Russia remains open to dialogue and cooperation with all states on information security. The aim is clear: to prevent conflicts in cyberspace, to promote the peaceful use of information and communication technologies, and to build digital capacity through international collaboration.
In the discussion about digital sovereignty, energy sector leadership noted that sovereignty cannot be created in isolation. The argument centered on the value of multilateral cooperation and the synergy that arises when states work together on technology-driven development. Such collaboration is presented as essential to achieving resilient, secure digital ecosystems that can withstand evolving cyber threats.
Industry representatives underscored the presence of a substantial array of advanced technologies and projects with global relevance. They argued that these innovations should be visible to, and in demand from, international partners, fostering wider adoption and collaboration that can accelerate global digital progress and security standards.
The roundtable on the digital transformation of public administration highlighted notable achievements in modernizing governance through technology. Participants identified key milestones, as well as remaining challenges, and discussed practical steps to bridge gaps in digital services, data governance, and administrative efficiency.
Another focal point was the national strategy for digital infrastructure. The discussion noted that domestic products and solutions are expanding rapidly and filling diverse needs across regions. It was pointed out that there are plentiful local solutions capable of supporting even the smallest communities, reinforcing the idea that a strong domestic technology base can contribute to broader digital resilience.
Overall, the exchange conveyed a clear message: strong cyber resilience requires a coordinated, multi-stakeholder approach. By sharing knowledge, aligning standards, and pooling resources, states can strengthen their information security postures while preserving the benefits of open and collaborative digital ecosystems.
As the conversation progressed, attendees explored concrete steps for advancing digital public administration, securing critical infrastructure, and fostering international cooperation in technology transfer and capacity building. The sense across the plenary was that progress hinges on transparent dialogue, practical joint initiatives, and a shared commitment to peaceful, productive use of information and communications technologies for the benefit of citizens everywhere.