Reevaluating the Armata: tech, tactics, and the next era of main battle tanks in North America and beyond

No time to read?
Get a summary

Reports indicate that Russian troops have started using the latest Armata tanks to strike Ukrainian positions. A source from a Russian news agency stated that the crews have begun combat coordination at training facilities in one of the Donbass regions. They emphasized that direct offensive actions had not yet occurred, but the deployment signals a real capability buildup.

Revolutionary breakthrough in tank building

The main battle tank T-14 Armata was developed by the Ural Transport Engineering Design Bureau, part of the United Machinery Plant system. In mid-2020, officials announced that the T-14 was tested in Syria, with authorities stating that the deployment aimed to reflect the full range of combat conditions. The T-14 is described as the latest in a line of Russian armored vehicles built on the Armata platform, which also spawned the T-15 infantry fighting vehicle and the T-16 armored recovery vehicle on the same foundation.

The T-14 is presented as the world’s first main battle tank to adopt a fundamentally new layout. Its crew of three sits in a forward hull compartment that is protected and separated from ammunition and fuel, in contrast to traditional designs where the crew, ammunition, and power sources share a common space. This separation improves safety in combat scenarios.

For the first time, the T-14 integrated a unified onboard information and control system designed for armored platforms. The core concept is network centrism with an open architecture, enabling a digital information exchange network that links all subsystems and functional units. This system provides real-time sensor data, status information, and control commands for drives and actuators, effectively allowing full digital management of the tank. The framework also supports the integration of elements from the Unified Tactical Level Control System, enabling coordinated use at company and battalion levels.

Where Armata family personnel carriers are concerned, combat control loops are reduced, enhancing firing effectiveness and tactical maneuverability. The T-14 is noted for employing stealth technologies aimed at reducing visibility across the electromagnetic spectrum. It also features an active protection complex and a curtain system that provides automatic defense against threats from any angle, including the upper hemisphere, regardless of guidance systems used by attackers.

Armor presents a multi-layer approach with rational angling and advanced materials. The most protected area is the crew capsule, designed to shield personnel in adverse conditions. Mobility relies on a versatile diesel powerplant with multiple boost modes, and the chassis is tuned for high performance off-road as well as road use. Automated systems monitor engine and transmission states to maintain optimal operation.

The main firepower comes from a 125 mm smoothbore cannon paired with a modern ammunition mix and guided missiles. The fire control system is fully digital, enabling the gunner and commander to interact through digital interfaces rather than direct optical channels. A digital ballistic path computes shooting conditions and tracks targets automatically, while the ESU TK interface enables target assignment to battalion networks and potential cross-aiming with other weapons in a broader fire plan.

In short, the T-14 Armata is positioned to become a leading option on the global tank market due to its integrated digital architecture, enhanced protection, and flexible fire control features.

nuances

Questions persist about the T-14 powerplant. The Armata propulsion system relies on the 12N360 family engine, with designations such as A-85-3A and 2V-12-3A. This engine predates the platform itself and was originally developed for a future project known as Object 195. Some analyses suggest that the engine needs further refinement to meet the platform’s full potential in terms of efficiency, heat management, and durability, a point of debate among defense analysts.

Experts also note that the T-14 turret hosts a suite of sensors, weather instruments, and communication antennas, along with infrared cameras and other devices. The vulnerability of these systems to direct hits or shell fragments is a continuing concern, particularly for exposed sensors on the turret surface. The Armata’s electronics-heavy configuration relies on imported components, prompting questions about sustained performance under heavy combat or countermeasures.

Autoloading mechanisms on the T-14 have drawn scrutiny, with manual reloading possible in case of autoloader failure. Some observers argue that autoloaders may not be essential for modern main battle tanks and that several Western designs favor manual loading for reliability. Cost considerations also factor into assessments of Armata’s overall value, as the platform reportedly carries a higher price tag than several contemporaries.

In July 2018, a senior government official highlighted that Armata-based tanks and other armored vehicles are notably expensive relative to existing weapons. The debate touched on market demand for legacy platforms like the T-72 in comparison with Western counterparts, emphasizing price, efficiency, and quality differences.

American response to Armata

American defense circles have outlined plans for a next-generation tank platform that could redefine battlefield roles. Current modernization efforts on the Abrams are described as approaching their final form, with future concepts focusing on a lighter chassis, adaptable shells, advanced sensors, drone interoperability, and integrated networks for network-centric warfare.

The Army’s Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center is actively exploring ideas for future tank platforms. Initial steps involve concept development and modeling, with tangible hardware still years away. The broader aim is to shape a vehicle capable of engaging a wider array of targets, including unmanned aerial systems and incoming artillery shells, through improved sensing and control networks.

Projections suggest that a future Abrams successor could emerge in the 2030s, incorporating a 120 mm equivalent gun and multi-purpose missiles designed for rapid mission adaptation. Enhanced data links, rangefinding, camera systems, meteorological sensors, and laser warning capabilities are expected to support networked, edge-to-edge battlefield awareness. While the path from concept to concrete production is long, analysts see a trajectory toward a more capable and integrated platform than today’s Abrams models.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Merkel, Minsk, and the Ukraine Conflict: A Contemporary Review

Next Article

Rewritten Overview of Elena Blinovskaya Case and Related Programs in Russia