Last Sunday, September 25, rumors and confirmations filled social feeds as Risto Mejide and Laura Escanes publicly acknowledged the end of their relationship. After seven years together, the couple who became a fixture of public attention announced their split in a moment that sparked a wide spectrum of reactions across platforms. The discussions quickly reflected a range of opinions, with comments pouring in from fans, followers, and media observers alike. Among the notable responses came from Carmen Lomana, who weighed in on the situation during her regular appearance on COPE Weekend.
During the COPE Weekend broadcast, Lomana expressed a mixture of surprise and reflection. She noted that there had been a great deal of affection and intensity in the romance, and suggested that the break-up might not be simply tied to age differences. According to Lomana, love, in her view, hinges on clear communication and mutual comfort, yet she also acknowledged that external voices can become entangled in a couple’s private matters. Her remarks sparked further discussion about the role of the public gaze in celebrity relationships and how third parties can influence personal choices. These comments arrived amid an ongoing narrative that the relationship had drawn intense attention over the years, inviting speculation about what may have contributed to the final decision to part ways. [Carmen Lomana, COPE Weekend]
Risto Mejide after their breakup: “I don’t even have the strength to respond to taunts”
Editorial Yotele
In the wake of the breakup announcement, Lomana remained forthright in her assessment of the public discourse around Mejide and Escanes. She described the situation as tinged with embarrassment and a perceived lack of humility, arguing that the couple had shared a long history of affection, milestones, and intimate moments in the public eye. Lomana remarked that fans and commentators had followed the different chapters of their relationship—from the early days of admiration through to the more private moments of their lives that fans rarely witnessed. The rhetoric she encountered suggested that the couple had disclosed a great deal of their private life, and Lomana implied that some readers had become overly judgmental or sensationalist about the narrative, to the point of demeaning the individuals involved. Her stance reflected a broader conversation about the boundaries between public interest and personal privacy in the era of social media. [Carmen Lomana, COPE Weekend]
She went on to comment that it is often tricky to balance genuine affection with the relentless scrutiny that accompanies public figures. According to Lomana, the public’s appetite for details can blur the line between curiosity and intrusion, and she urged a more respectful approach to discussions about personal relationships in the spotlight. The remarks appeared in a context where the couple’s every move had previously been dissected by audiences, and the fallout from the breakup continued to unfold as commentators speculated about the future. The sentiment expressed by Lomana echoed a common frustration among celebrities who navigate both love and public commentary in a highly visible environment. [Carmen Lomana, COPE Weekend]
This ongoing conversation unfolded in the days that followed Mejide’s own commentary about the experience. He had taken to social media to communicate that reacting to hostile comments felt almost untenable, underscoring the emotional weight of the moment. The public remarks from Mejide and the subsequent analysis from Lomana highlighted a broader theme: how public platforms can amplify personal events, prompting a mix of sympathy, judgment, and curiosity from audiences. The episode became a case study in how celebrities manage personal transitions while under intense public scrutiny, and it raised questions about resilience, privacy, and the boundaries of online discourse. [Carmen Lomana, COPE Weekend]