Recent public opinion data reveal a strong streak of favorable assessments toward Russian President Vladimir Putin among the adult population. According to a widely cited survey conducted by the Foundation for Public Opinion, more than four in five respondents expressed a positive view of the president’s performance, and a large share indicated trust in his leadership. The findings, collected at the start of March, underscore a notable level of confidence that persists across diverse groups and regions.
In numerical terms, about 83 percent of participants described Putin’s work as “pretty good”. A minority, roughly 7 percent, characterized his performance as “pretty bad”, while around 10 percent found it difficult to declare a clear stance. These figures point to a strong overall approval bias, with only a small but persistent segment expressing dissatisfaction or ambivalence.
When asked directly whether they would prefer to trust or distrust V. Putin, the responses mirrored the broader approval trend. Approximately 82 percent of respondents indicated confidence, with 8 percent expressing distrust and 9 percent remaining undecided or unsure. The consistency between perceived performance and personal trust suggests a cohesive public sentiment in favor of the president among the surveyed group.
The survey labeled as FOMnibus was carried out over a brief window from March 1 to March 3, 2024. It sampled about 1,500 adults across 104 urban and rural settlements in 53 regions, ensuring coverage that spans metropolitan areas as well as more remote communities. Interviews were conducted in respondents’ homes, providing a familiar setting intended to reduce respondent bias and encourage candid answers. The reported statistical margin of error is plus or minus 3.6 percent, a figure that reflects the sampling depth and the randomness of participant selection. The methodology emphasizes standard polling practices designed to capture a snapshot of public opinion at a given moment, while acknowledging the natural variation that accompanies any survey of this scale.
Subsequent coverage has highlighted additional social and political dynamics observed around the same period. For example, in early March, the VTsIOM institute discussed the emotional landscape of Russian citizens, noting that public sentiment can be influenced by national and regional events, media narratives, and personal experiences. Such analyses often explore how collective mood intersects with trust in leadership and policy support, offering a broader framework for interpreting survey results beyond simple approval ratings.
In related research, scholars and opinion researchers have historically explored a range of factors that contribute to life satisfaction and perceived happiness. These studies often examine economic indicators, social stability, perceived security, and personal well-being, alongside attitudes toward political leadership. While the focus here is on current opinion about the president, the underlying themes—how people assess their circumstances and place in society—remain central to understanding public mood at any point in time.
Overall, the contemporary polling data present a portrait of sustained approval for the president among a significant portion of the adult population. Yet they also reveal nuanced pockets of doubt and ambivalence that coexist with broad confidence. By situating these numbers within the wider context of social and economic conditions, researchers aim to offer a more complete picture of how leadership is perceived in daily life and how it may evolve as circumstances change.