The surprising news that Chenoa had separated from Miguel Sánchez Encinas after nearly one and a half years of marriage continued to spark a flood of reactions across media and social platforms. One of the most talked about comments came from José Antonio Corradini, the singer’s biological father, who had not spoken to his daughter for more than 26 years. On the Telecinco program Socialité, he offered a blunt assessment: it was a consensual arrangement.
“He needs to climb the social ladder, and he needed someone with a surname to help with that”, Corradini said, adding that the singer has always had feelings for David Bisbal and that her heart remains with him. These remarks arrived just as the topic was being debated in public spaces, prompting a flurry of responses from fans and critics alike.
This Monday, This Is Life weighed in on the matter after Corradini’s statements. Sandra Barneda did not mince words in defense of Chenoa, expressing clear support for the singer and labeling Corradini’s comments as some of the harshest she had heard in the broadcast’s history.
During a live moment, the host steered the discussion in a direction that challenged Antonio Montero’s position as he defended Corradini. The exchange escalated as Barneda pressed the point, asking why the father might be invited to speak if the conversation centers on the daughter’s choices and experiences.
The dialogue intensified as Barneda questioned the premise of the discussion, underscoring the principle that questions themselves are not inherently harmful, but the answers they elicit reveal much about the people involved. The host insisted that freedom of expression includes asking questions, while also arguing that a father who has not maintained a close relationship with his daughter should not be excused from accountability for his public comments.
Barneda’s stance was straightforward and unapologetic: a father who has never spoken well of his daughter does not lose the right to be heard, but his words can still be hurtful and unfair. The conversation also touched on the broader social dynamics at play, including how public narratives can influence personal healing and family relationships. It was emphasized that trust and responsibility are important ingredients in any family story, and that the impact of a parent’s words can reach far beyond the moment of a televised interview.
As the discussion moved forward, Barneda reaffirmed her support for Chenoa and for maintaining a respectful discourse about family matters. She closed the segment by acknowledging the emotional weight carried by those involved and offering condolences in a moment of vulnerability. The show then shifted to another topic, but the exchange left a lasting impression on viewers who had followed the unfolding events across social and traditional media.
Overall, the episode underscored a core tension in celebrity news: the balance between free expression and the harm that certain statements can cause when directed at a family member. It also highlighted how public figures navigate relationships that have long been private, and how their personal histories can become part of a larger, ongoing conversation about identity, loyalty, and the pressures of life in the spotlight. The dialogue reflected a broader demand for accountability without losing sight of empathy, offering a nuanced glimpse into how audiences interpret celebrity dynamics in today’s media landscape.