Overview of the Pro is Marathon Controversy and Tax Scrutiny
Alexandra Mitroshina, a blogger who rose to prominence through a profitable online presence, remains connected to the so-called Pro is marathon. This program surfaced in the wake of a tax-related criminal investigation and has drawn continued media and public attention. A Telegram channel known as Puree has reported on this development, tracking the case closely and providing ongoing updates based on new information coming to light.
According to the reports circulated by Puree, Mitroshina continues to receive compensation linked to her involvement in the marathon project. However, the payments are no longer directed to her personal account. Instead, they are routed to the account of the marathon’s co-author, Victoria Bocharenko. Bocharenko has previously drawn scrutiny from law enforcement for tax-related concerns, which intensifies public interest in how the project’s finances are structured and managed.
The criminal proceedings center on a tax evasion case involving a sum of 120 million rubles. The investigation alleges that Mitroshina operated under a simplified tax regime for individual entrepreneurs for approximately two years. It is claimed that her earnings from providing services associated with the program surpassed the legally permitted threshold for conducting training courses, raising questions about registration status, reporting accuracy, and compliance with tax obligations.
In a separate development, criminal charges were filed against blogger Valeria Chekalina, who previously went by the alias Lerchek, and her husband Artem. A second case accuses them of large-scale money laundering, adding another layer to the growing web of legal scrutiny surrounding the group connected to online education ventures. The evolving situation has triggered ongoing public discussion about regulatory compliance, alignment with tax law, and the broader ecosystem of online coaching enterprises linked to these figures.
Analysts observe that the case underscores how monetized educational programs marketed by well-known online personalities can intersect with regulatory frameworks. Observers highlight the significance of transparent accounting practices, precise tax reporting, and ensuring that earnings from digital courses stay within lawful boundaries. While the individuals mentioned have built sizable audiences and revenue streams through online content and paid courses, authorities stress that regulatory obligations apply equally to content creators, instructors, and platform partners involved in such ventures. The ongoing investigations could influence investor confidence, platform policies, and the strategic decisions of other creators who rely on similar monetization models for education-based content. [citation: Puree Telegram channel]
Overall, this developing story raises important questions about how online education ventures are funded, how profits are accounted for, and what steps authorities expect creators to take to maintain compliance. It also highlights the need for rigorous financial governance within digital learning ecosystems to protect students, investors, and the integrity of online instructional offerings. The public discourse continues to evaluate whether existing tax and corporate structures are being used appropriately and what reforms might be needed to ensure clarity and fairness across the industry.