Lawyer Elena Kuderko spoke in an interview with the agency, explaining that not every homeowner is required to pay for capital repairs. The focus was on residents living in emergency housing slated for demolition, where the responsibility to fund major improvements does not fall on all occupants.
The lawyer emphasized that in these cases it is not advisable to charge residents for repairs, and there is no obligation to collect funds from owners for this service. The key message is that immediate repair costs may be waived when the housing situation involves imminent demolition and displacement.
Beyond the immediate relief for those facing displacement, the discussion highlighted advantages for elderly and low-income residents. If a dwelling belongs to an owner who is 80 years old or older, capital repair contributions are covered by the state budget. This support is contingent on the owner living alone or with relatives who are disabled or retired, ensuring that the most vulnerable individuals have access to essential maintenance without placing an extra burden on them.
Additionally, Kuderko noted that Russians aged between 70 and 79 would receive a 50 percent subsidy toward their care contributions. This measure acknowledges the heightened needs of seniors in maintaining safe living environments and reducing out-of-pocket costs for those who require assistance.
Another group identified as beneficiaries includes veterans of labor, recipients of disability status from the Great Patriotic War, participants in the war, and families with many children. For these households, the benefit rate is set at 30 percent, reflecting a policy aim to support those with distinguished service or significant family responsibilities.
The overview also touched on the broader framework being considered in Russia for adjusting capital repair costs by region. The aim is to tailor funding and support to local conditions, recognizing that housing markets and maintenance needs can vary significantly from one region to another. This regional approach seeks to balance budgetary realities with the goal of protecting vulnerable residents while ensuring that capital repairs are carried out where most needed. The discussion framed these adjustments as part of a longer-term strategy to improve housing quality and reduce the financial strain on individuals with limited means.
Across these provisions, the guiding principle is to differentiate responsibilities according to residents’ circumstances and to preserve dignity for those facing housing instability. The policy framework aims to prevent unnecessary financial hardship while enabling essential repairs to proceed in a timely manner. In practical terms, this means that eligible seniors and low-income households may rely on state support to cover portions or all of capital repair costs, depending on their age, living arrangements, and eligibility status. For recipients with a history of service or family needs, additional percentages apply to reflect their contributions to society and family stability. The evolving plan foresees regional adjustments, ensuring that local budgets reflect the unique housing dynamics of each area, with ongoing evaluation to maintain fairness and sustainability. In summary, the system strives to protect vulnerable groups from bearing the full burden of major repairs while maintaining a pathway for necessary improvements to residential housing. The overall intent is to secure safer living conditions without compromising financial security for those most at risk. Citations: Agency report and subsequent policy notes indicate these directions are under consideration and subject to implementation timelines and regional governance structures.