In the Sverdlovsk region, a police major received compensation totaling 14 thousand rubles after his dismissal from the Sukholozhsky interior ministry department. The report comes from ura.ru and centers on a sequence of disciplinary and legal events that unfolded over several months.
The former deputy head of the criminal investigation department, Andrei Timakin, was dismissed from the police last autumn. His departure followed an incident in which he was found driving under the influence. The situation began when he caused a traffic accident and called the traffic police for assistance. Upon arriving at the scene, Major Roman Fedonov, a colleague, became involved in a confrontation. The dispute escalated, and Fedonov fired a traumatic pistol at Timakin. A criminal case was opened against Fedonov, and he was placed under house arrest while investigators continued their work.
Timakin’s dismissal occurred in November, and the former officer challenged the compensation amount in court, seeking a higher payment as part of his severance package. The case drew attention to the specifics of dismissal procedures and the calculations used to determine severance sums in the region.
According to the Sukholozhsky City Court, the claim saw partial satisfaction. After the initial dismissal, Timakin’s compensation was recalculated, but he disagreed with the final figure. The court ultimately ordered a payment of 14 thousand rubles. The court emphasized that the decision had not yet come into full force and effect, noting that additional steps could still be taken before it became legally binding.
The claimant had hoped to have his discharge deemed unlawful and to reclaim his former post within the interior ministry. However, that request was denied, and the case proceeded within the framework of the established law on dismissal and severance rights. The court’s ruling reflects the careful balancing of employment law considerations, disciplinary measures, and financial compensation that can accompany police personnel decisions in such cases.
Beyond the specifics of this individual case, observers note that the broader implications touch on how disciplinary actions are structured within regional police departments, how disputes over severance are handled, and how courts assess the reasonableness of compensation in scenarios involving misconduct and personnel changes. The dynamics at play—especially in high-pressure environments—underscore the importance of clear procedures, documented evidence, and fair review processes for all officers facing termination or disciplinary actions. As the legal process continues, the involved parties may pursue further steps if applicable, while the public watches how local authorities apply policy to real-world incidents.
In related developments, there have been broader discussions about accountability and safety within law enforcement circles, as well as ongoing reviews of how incidents at the scene of a crash are managed and how internal investigations are conducted. These conversations reflect ongoing efforts to ensure that police processes maintain public trust and adhere to established legal standards while safeguarding the rights of officers and the communities they serve. The situation in Sverdlovsk serves as a case study in how complex interactions between police personnel, disciplinary actions, and civil claims are resolved within the Russian legal framework and regional administrative practices. The outcome of this case illustrates the careful, stepwise approach courts use to evaluate severance compensation and the legitimacy of dismissal in similar circumstances. In summary, a 14 thousand ruble award was upheld as part of the broader settlement, with the court reserving room for further action if necessary and appropriate under the law. The case remains a pertinent reference point for future disputes involving police personnel, compensation calculations, and the boundaries of lawful termination in the region.