Researchers at the University of York have explored whether living with a companion animal genuinely improves the mental health of people dealing with serious mental illnesses. The study, published in Human-Animal Interactions, examined real world experiences rather than assuming a universal benefit from pet companionship.
In a survey involving 170 British adults diagnosed with conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the researchers found that 81 participants owned at least one pet. The vast majority reported that their animals provided steady companionship and a sense of being loved. Yet owning a pet did not correlate with higher overall well-being, nor did it reliably reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, or loneliness. These findings challenge the common belief that pet ownership automatically improves mental health outcomes for this group.
The researchers note that the results mirror nuanced realities of living with mental illness. While many individuals described pets as invaluable sources of comfort, the relationship between animal care and mental health is complex and influenced by daily stressors, support networks, and access to resources. The study underscores that companionship from animals can offer meaningful emotional support without necessarily changing clinical indicators of distress.
A follow-up survey conducted in 2021 among the same cohort suggested a different pattern. During that period, some participants reported worse mental health associated with pet ownership. The researchers attribute this in part to pandemic-related restrictions and the practical burdens of caring for an animal while facing isolation and limited in-person support. The experience invites a broader discussion about how external pressures interact with the responsibilities of pet care for people with serious mental illness.
Experts emphasize that the assumption pets are universally beneficial for mental health should be questioned. The pandemic created a unique moment to examine this issue, revealing that for many, animals provided a lifeline during difficult times. At the same time, the added responsibilities, stress, and anxiety linked to caring for a pet without adequate support can offset some potential gains in well-being. The findings encourage clinicians, caregivers, and policymakers to consider individual circumstances, provide practical guidance, and expand access to veterinary and mental health resources to support those who share their lives with animals.
As the field moves forward, researchers call for more longitudinal work that tracks mental health outcomes over time, taking into account veterinary welfare, social support, housing stability, and access to treatment. This approach aims to clarify when animal companionship is most beneficial and when additional supports are needed to ensure it contributes positively to daily life for people living with serious mental illness. The evolving evidence base invites families and healthcare teams to collaborate on personalized plans that acknowledge both the value of pets and the realities of ongoing mental health care.
In sum, while many people with serious mental illness find profound meaning and companionship in their pets, this does not guarantee improved mental health outcomes across all measures. The conversation about pets and well-being is changing from a one-size-fits-all narrative to a more nuanced understanding that respects individual experience and the broader social determinants of health. Researchers and clinicians alike advocate for balanced expectations, informed decision making, and comprehensive support that recognizes the diverse experiences of pet owners facing serious mental health challenges. .
ancient scientists to solveHow can we improve the quality of life of the elderly by an hour a day?