Nearly two dozen deaths in a single day have stunned Peru, a tragedy unfolding amid clashes between police and protesters. Data from authorities and monitoring organizations has raised alarms about a political crisis that spiraled after a series of dramatic moves that unsettled the country. The United Nations has noted a shift from governance concerns to a surge in violence as the crisis deepened. The situation has deteriorated since December when a high-stakes political confrontation led to the dissolution of parliament and a rapid sequence of events that requires careful understanding.
How did this flare-up become a defining moment for Peru?
Pedro Castillo’s dramatic tenure
Pedro Castillo, a left-leaning former teacher and a symbol for many who felt left behind, rose to the presidency in Peru after a highly contested electoral race. His tenure, from July 2021 to December 2022, was marked by intense pressure and unprecedented moves, including rapid changes in the cabinet within a span of months. That sequence underscored the volatility that defined his administration and the broader political landscape of the country.
The challenges Castillo faced were compounded by corruption investigations, internal disputes, and sustained scrutiny from the press. The situation escalated when calls for sweeping reforms collided with persistent political deadlock. Following impeachment proceedings and police intervention, Castillo faced a risky political moment that reshaped the country’s governance trajectory.
Boluarte takes the helm
Dina Boluarte, who served as vice president during Castillo’s administration, assumed the presidency after the events that led to his removal. Her administration pledged to form a unity government aimed at stabilizing the country and addressing the crisis with a plan that would hold elections in the near term. Boluarte signaled a readiness to pursue a path toward national reconciliation while also navigating a deeply fractured political environment. Her government outlined a roadmap that included elections slated for 2024 to reestablish legitimacy and public confidence.
Regional tensions flare up
Protests spread beyond the capital and quickly intensified in major southern cities, particularly along the border with Bolivia. In these regions, many residents come from Quechua-speaking communities with strong agricultural roots and a long history of economic marginalization. The protests reflected frustrations with governance and development, turning violent as confrontations with security forces escalated. Local communities expressed a sense of exclusion from national decisions and demanded more inclusive leadership.
The southern corridor, including areas such as Arequipa, Apurímac, Ayacucho, Cusco and Puno, has long been a cradle of indigenous identity and cultural resilience. Residents saw a leadership change as a moment of opportunity but also as a painful turning point. The protests carried a strong regional character, rooted in economic disparities and demands for political voice that had persisted for years.
Rising casualties and ongoing scrutiny
In the southern zones, authorities reported a rising death toll as clashes with police continued. The toll has drawn global attention and prompted questions about crowd control and civil rights. The way the crisis has been handled has prompted investigations and international warnings about the risk of a broader cycle of violence. Observers emphasize that the path toward stabilization requires measured responses, clear accountability, and trusted communication with communities most affected by the turmoil.