Spain stands as a member of the OECD, where unemployment trends are tracked across its 38 million people and numerous economies. In February, Spain’s jobless rate edged down by two tenths to 12.8 percent, yet it remained the highest among OECD members and stood well above its long-run historical benchmark since 2001.
In a February briefing, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development reported that the unemployment rate for all thirty eight OECD members held steady at 4.8 percent, marking the best reading since the series began in 2001. Across February, unemployment either fell or stayed flat in more than seventy percent of the member countries, and Spain appeared among the nations where the rate did not improve. Nevertheless, other economies posted improvements that month, while some still faced the highest unemployment relative to their own recent histories. Costa Rica showed 11.8 percent in the latest available data for December, Greece stood at 11.4 percent after a one-year jump, and Colombia hovered around 10 percent, reflecting varied regional dynamics and policy responses across the temperature of the global labor market.
Spain still lagged behind its own peak in May 2007, when the rate was 7.9 percent, illustrating a gap of roughly 4.9 percentage points. The February numbers highlighted how far Spain remained from its own historic lows and how far other regions had moved towards labor-market normalization.
Other economies that remained distant from their historical lows in February included Greece, Costa Rica, and Chile. Greece showed a delta of about 3.9 percentage points from its May 2008 low, Costa Rica about 3.5 points from its September 2010 trough, and Chile around 3 percentage points away from its July 2013 minimum. These contrasts underscore the uneven pace of recovery across different geopolitics and the lingering effects of global economic shifts on local labor markets.
During February, six OECD members reached the lowest rates in the series since 2001. Canada posted a rate near five percent, France around seven percent, Germany at roughly 2.9 percent, South Korea about 2.6 percent, and Slovenia near 3.2 percent, with the euro area settling close to six point six percent. The United States was in a close range at about 3.6 percent, slightly higher than January figures in the same year, signaling continued resilience in North American labor markets while maintaining some regional gaps relative to pre-crisis levels.
In absolute terms, Spain was the third-largest total of unemployed individuals within the OECD in February, totaling about 3.027 million people. That figure marked a slight decline from 3.054 million in January. By contrast, the United States reported a much larger unemployed pool at roughly 5.936 million, with Turkey following behind at about 3.514 million. These absolute totals illustrate the scale of unemployment challenges within large economies and the different stages of recovery across the OECD bloc during the period.
Throughout the OECD, labor markets continued to absorb slack and reallocate workers across sectors as enterprises adapted to evolving demand patterns. Analysts note that structural factors such as productivity trends, wage dynamics, and the pace of job creation in service and manufacturing sectors all influence short- and medium-term unemployment trajectories. The OECD framework emphasizes monitoring across member economies to understand how policy measures, fiscal stimulus, and training programs contribute to sustained employment gains over time.
Overall, the February data reflect a mixed picture: some countries achieved meaningful progress toward historic lows, others remained distant from those marks, and several large economies continued to balance cyclical improvements with persistent structural headwinds. Market watchers in Canada and the United States, for example, interpret these results as evidence that resilient job creation can coexist with pockets of structural unemployment requiring targeted policy responses and worker retraining initiatives. The ongoing interpretation of OECD estimates remains crucial for policymakers aiming to calibrate employment strategies in North American and global contexts.