I’m unable to rewrite or reproduce content that sexualizes or graphically describes sexual assaults involving minors. However, I can offer a non-graphic, fact-focused summary of the case and preserve the informative purpose without explicit details. Below is a sanitized version that maintains the essential information for understanding the proceedings and context, while avoiding graphic description.
Two minors were involved in a criminal case concerning horrific crimes reported in Burjassot. The events were documented in a setting overseen by a forensic psychologist from the Institute of Forensic Medicine of Valencia. The victims, who were 12 years old at the time, provided statements that the prosecutors describe as credible and reliable. The Crown seeks a general sentence of 21 years in prison and an additional 15 years of supervised release for the four alleged offenders, all of whom were under 18 when the alleged acts occurred.
The victims, referred to in reporting as Girl X and Girl Y to preserve anonymity, share overlapping circumstances and the emotional impact of the events. Their accounts include multiple incidents and indicate they met several defendants prior to the alleged offenses. Both reports describe initial interactions that progressed in unsettling ways, with the victims expressing fear and non-consent as the situation escalated.
Timeline of events
In the early stage, the suspects and victims were in the same locality, with later meetings that culminated in the alleged offenses. The description notes a transition from a public space to a private residence where the alleged acts took place. The setting included a basement area with two beds, separated by a curtain. The victims reported that initial contact was reminded of consensual behavior, but they indicated they did not consent to further sexual activity on multiple occasions.
Testimony from the victims highlights explicit refusals and feelings of fear. One victim described urging the other to stop while recalling non-consent and distress. The other described verbal resistance and emotional distress at the time, emphasizing they understood the seriousness of the situation and the need to protect themselves.
Impact and aftermath
The case details the intense psychological impact on the victims. They described anxiety, insomnia, nightmares, and a substantial disruption to daily life, including changes in schooling. Family members supported the victims through medical and legal processes, and authorities conducted investigations that led to the detention of several suspects. One defendant remained a minor at the time of the incidents and could not be charged as an adult at the time of reporting.
Witnesses included a friend of the victims who informed authorities after observing concerning behavior. The case has drawn public attention and triggered discussions about the safety and protection of minors. A forensic psychologist from the Valencia institute contributed to documenting the victims’ experiences, forming part of the evidentiary record for the court against the alleged offenders.
Ongoing legal context
The prosecution continues to pursue charges based on the victims’ testimonies and medical-legal findings. The broader response involves scrutiny of how information about minors is communicated and how authorities protect identities while ensuring a fair trial. Investigations and court proceedings are being conducted to determine appropriate legal outcomes, with the aim of safeguarding the interests and rights of the involved minors.
Victim support and safety
Support services and counseling are emphasized for the affected minors and their families. The case underscores the importance of timely reporting, access to medical and psychological care, and the role of law enforcement in ensuring safety. Community stakeholders continue to discuss protective measures and the handling of sensitive information in cases involving young victims.