moral authority and the call for humanitarian law
Hamas is described by many as a terrorist organization, while Israel is viewed by supporters as a state with a right to defend itself within the bounds of international humanitarian law. In a plenary session of the European Parliament, the high representative for EU foreign policy, Josep Borrell, conveyed a clear message: there is a demand for accountability and a careful balance between security concerns and humanitarian principles. The discussion followed criticisms directed at the absence of strong remarks about Israel’s siege of Gaza during a recent visit and speech, including concerns that the European People’s Party, represented by Borrell, did not travel to the region for first-hand assessment. The exchange highlighted the ongoing tension among European leaders as they navigate a complex, unfolding crisis in the Middle East. (citation: European Parliament statements)
One representative explained the difficulties of a planned trip to Israel. The schedule had included a commitment to visit Ramallah, the administrative heart of the Palestinian Authority. Yet, in the wake of recent events, there was a belief that it would be essential to address all sides equally. The speaker emphasized that disarray or interagency debates would not be helpful; unity on core principles was seen as the priority. The conversation also touched on Manfred Weber’s stance amid debates within European capitals and at the European Council about the scope and tone of the union’s approach to the conflict. (citation: EU leadership remarks)
Leaders from the Twenty-Seven issued a political declaration that was reaffirmed in the following days, underscoring several critical points: wars impose constraints, and cutting off essential resources violates humanitarian norms. It was noted that current circumstances involve a severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza, including a lack of water and a rising death toll, with a substantial portion of casualties consisting of children. Importantly, the responsibility for Hamas’ actions should not be used to blame innocent Gazans as a whole. The need for a careful, principled approach to consequence management and accountability was emphasized in the discussion. (citation: bloc declarations)
moral authority
In urging the practical application of international law, a call was made to consider the prohibition on depriving a besieged population of essential water resources. The appeal stressed that such measures are illegal under international law and should be weighed when assessing the conflict. The argument highlighted that without a clear moral framework, it becomes difficult for international voices to carry weight in mediation and reconciliation. The message stressed the importance of consistency, humanity, and the shared obligation to acknowledge suffering on all sides. The tragedy of human loss, including casualties from October 7 and the broader toll in Gaza, was presented as a reminder that mourning should not be restricted to any single side. (citation: international law texts)
The discussion also touched on the obligation to condemn violence consistently. The idea was that compassionate responses to casualties arising from terrorist attacks should not preclude sensitivity to other victims. A strong stance was advocated to ensure that moral authority remains credible; condemnation should be principled and universal. The aim was to communicate that Europe’s credibility hinges on recognizing the suffering of all innocent people and on supporting actions that align with democratic values and humanitarian norms. The commission chair’s representative reiterated that Europe must acknowledge Israel’s right to defend itself while also advocating for lawful and humane treatment of civilians caught in the conflict. The emphasis remained on preventing further deterioration of the humanitarian situation and on maintaining pressure toward a sustainable and lawful resolution. (citation: EU statements and policy positions)
In his remarks, the Spanish politician urged determination in opposing terrorism and called for a proactive approach to conflict resolution. He warned against Hamas’ rejection of peace initiatives, noting that a cycle of violence, if unbroken, risks repeating itself. The discussion cautioned against decisions that would isolate or anger regional actors, including the United Nations and the Arab League, and stressed the importance of peace over prolonged hostility. The warning reflected concerns that this phase of the conflict could become darker and urged the international community to take decisive steps. The sense was that tough choices must be made at critical moments, and that the world stands at a precipice where action is required to prevent further devastation. (citation: regional and international reactions)