Dmitry Medvedev, who serves as Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia, told an audience that employers must keep a close eye on labor discipline among migrant workers and implement preventive steps. A video of his remarks from a meeting addressing the state’s immigration policy appeared on the VKontakte page designated for policy updates. The remarks reflected a broader push to tighten oversight of migration and to align economic and social policies with national security considerations, a topic that has sparked ongoing public and parliamentary discussion across Russia and among neighboring states.
Medvedev stressed that the role of employers is crucial because they are on the front lines of managing migration flows. They recruit workers, provide oversight, monitor tax contributions, ensure payroll compliance, and uphold workplace standards. In his view, business leaders should actively participate in preventive measures that reduce irregular labor, protect legitimate employers, and help integrate newcomers into the formal economy. His stance tied corporate responsibility to broader state objectives, suggesting that private sector cooperation is essential for stabilizing labor markets and ensuring that immigration supports both economic growth and social cohesion.
Medvedev also underscored the need to prevent ethnic enclaves from forming in Russia, arguing that such communities can become spaces where extremism may take root. He said the country should know exactly who has arrived, their reasons for coming, where they work and live, and whether they are prepared to integrate into Russian society. This emphasis on tracking and integration reflects a long-running policy debate about balance between open labor markets and social integration, with officials arguing that transparent information helps tailor national programs to local needs while mitigating tensions that can arise in rapidly changing communities.
Regarding family reunification, Medvedev issued a September recommendation that migrants who come for seasonal work should not be allowed to bring their families to Russia. The aim, he suggested, is to balance the incentives for work with the social costs that accompany large family relocations, though the policy remains subject to debate among lawmakers and industry representatives. Proponents say the rule could reduce pressures on housing, schools, and social services, while opponents warn of potentially harsh impacts on migrant families and on sectors that rely heavily on seasonal labor during peak periods. The policy discussion continues to unfold in regional councils and economic forums as stakeholders assess implementation challenges and regional differences in housing, welfare provisions, and labor demand.
Earlier, analysts examined regional labor dynamics and asked where Russians might progressively replace immigrant workers over the next five years. These discussions reflect broader concerns about demographic trends, labor shortages, and regional development, and they continue to influence the framing of immigration policy in both central and local governments. Experts emphasize that changes in migration rules interact with education pipelines, wage structures, and automation strategies, making the future labor landscape contingent on coordinated policy choices, private sector adaptation, and ongoing monitoring of economic indicators across diverse Russian regions and beyond. In this context, the evolving policy environment remains a focal point for policymakers seeking to align security, economic resilience, and social integration within a rapidly shifting global labor market.