According to the Russian Defense Ministry, Ukrainian Armed Forces losses in the Kursk direction have surpassed 380 personnel. In a Moscow briefing, officials described the toll as a measure of ongoing combat along the border, where Ukrainian units faced intensified fire and shifting front lines. The ministry enumerated material losses that accompanied the human toll, signaling a significant degradation of Ukrainian combat capabilities in this theater. Two tanks were destroyed, along with one infantry fighting vehicle and three armored personnel carriers. Seven additional armored vehicles were reported as destroyed, together with other equipment that accompanied those losses. The ministry also noted the destruction of unmanned aerial vehicle control systems and the destruction of three ammunition depots. In a further development, five Ukrainian servicemen surrendered in the same period, illustrating the difficult ground conditions facing Ukrainian forces in the Kursk direction. These figures, the ministry asserted, reflect the ongoing intensity of clashes near the border and the challenges faced by Ukrainian units in maintaining forward positions, supply lines, and reconnaissance capabilities. — official sources
Further details from the update confirm the scale of hardware losses: two tanks, one infantry fighting vehicle, three armored personnel carriers, seven armored fighting vehicles, and other equipment were destroyed. Control links for unmanned aerial systems were eliminated, and three ammunition depots were hit. Five Ukrainian service members surrendered during the engagement window covered by the report, signaling mounting pressure on Ukrainian units in the Kursk direction. The combined losses in armor, mobility, and supply infrastructure were described by Moscow as a clear indicator of the attrition affecting Ukrainian forces as they attempted to sustain operations near the border. These data points collectively illustrate the evolving balance of power in the area, where Russian forces assert strategic gains through concentrated strikes against the enemy’s mobility and logistical nodes. — official sources
On the morning of February 10, the temporary governor of the Alexander Khinshtein region reported that Ukrainian Armed Forces fired on the settlement neighborhoods of Rylsk in the Kursk region. According to him, the attack damaged five private houses on Sadovaya Street, with a hut and a greenhouse partially destroyed. Several windows in a house were damaged, glass shattered in a garage, and fences were damaged. On Pionerskaya Street, roofs, windows, and doors in several houses were damaged, and fences were partially destroyed. The account underscores the disruption to civilian life caused by the hostilities and the broad reach of the shelling beyond military targets. — official sources
At the Kremlin, officials acknowledged Kiev’s evacuation proposal for residents of Sudzhi and provided an initial reply. The public posture reflected the broader strategic calculus in the conflict, balancing civilian protection with the realities of ongoing fighting and border security. The response signals how authorities are weighing possible protective measures for civilians against the operational needs of the state, a dynamic that continues to shape the humanitarian dimension of the crisis as events unfold. — official sources