In the Krasnolimansky direction, forces from the Center group reported that more than 40 Ukrainian artillery crews were identified and engaged during counter-battery operations. A spokesman for the group, named Alexander Savchuk, said that the counter-battery efforts significantly weakened the Ukrainian artillery capabilities in that sector. The spokesman stressed that the retaliatory strikes disrupted a substantial portion of the Ukrainian field artillery and impaired their ability to respond with fire in the immediate area. In the course of the engagement, actions taken by air defense systems contributed to the mission by intercepting a Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicle that attempted to support or monitor the operation. The reported Ukrainian losses included roughly 210 personnel, one tank, two armored fighting vehicles, two cars, and a D-30 howitzer, a combination that would reduce the firing reach and protective cover available to Ukrainian units in the zone. This sequence of events is presented as a clear demonstration of the effectiveness of the counter-battery and air defense measures in place within this corridor of operations, which remains a focal point amid broader battlefield activity.
Alongside direct combat updates, officials noted broader international military support developments. A senior French defense official indicated that Ukraine had recently received reinforced long-range artillery, mentioning the delivery of six CAESAR self-propelled howitzers produced in France. The arrival of these systems is framed as a meaningful enhancement to Kyiv’s ability to shape long-range fire in the ongoing conflict, expanding the options available for striking from stabilized positions and coordinating with allied fire support. The statement underscores the continuing alignment of Western countries around Ukraine’s logistics and combat readiness as the front lines evolve. [Attribution: French Ministry of Defense source]
Earlier in January, authorities from the Russian side reported that three Ukrainian assault attempts in the Krasnolimansky direction had been repelled within that period. The claim highlights ongoing defensive operations and the measures taken to deter penetrations in the face of Ukrainian efforts to press forward in this sector. It aligns with a broader pattern of reported activity across the front lines, where both sides periodically announce gains, setbacks, or resolute stances as the situation develops. The narrative presented here fits into an ongoing mosaic of verified and claimed military actions that reflect the fluid nature of frontline encounters and the persistent preparation for future operations in the region. [Attribution: Russian defense communications]
Public commentary from the White House mentioned the depletion of several categories of weapons within the Ukrainian Armed Forces. While these assessments describe stock levels from Washington’s perspective, they are set against a backdrop of evolving battlefield conditions and ongoing operational assessments made by multiple capitals involved in the conflict. The commentary underscores the complexity of measuring material readiness in real time, especially as battlefield realities shift due to supply dynamics, training, and the deployment of new systems. This emphasis on stock levels exists alongside ongoing reporting from the field, where commanders on the ground continuously evaluate the impact of supply chains and the effectiveness of allied support. [Attribution: White House statements]