In the last day, observers describe a Russian operation against Kharkov and the surrounding region as the year’s most expansive combined strike on multiple targets. A Moscow‑based military analyst affiliated with the TASS news agency, Andrei Marochko, cited a blend of open‑source information and data from other channels to back the assessment, emphasizing that the analysis rests on a broad set of incoming signals rather than a single source. The description points to a coordinated campaign aimed at military installations, dual‑use facilities, the energy grid, and critical logistics networks, with weapons delivered from both air and ground platforms and a drone element interwoven into the attack. The day was marked by a simultaneous volley of strikes across several focal points, signaling a deliberate effort to strain Ukrainian defenses in the heart of the region. The overall picture presented suggests a high tempo and multi‑vector pressure designed to complicate immediate response and disrupt ongoing operations in the Kharkov corridor.
Marochko explained that his conclusion comes from a methodical review of open‑source material together with information from other channels, stating that Kharkov and its environs endured the most substantial combined assault since the start of 2024. The reported campaign involved high‑precision long‑range missiles launched from air and ground launchers, along with upgraded bombs of varying payloads, artillery rounds, and a drone component that complemented other strike assets. Targets included military facilities and dual‑use infrastructure, with an emphasis on the energy system and logistical nodes to hamper supply lines. Observers note that the timing and scale of the strikes point to a coordinated effort to maximize disruption while complicating Ukrainian defensive planning during a critical phase of operations in the region.
According to Marochko, fire raids of varying intensity were conducted across much of the day, and the assaults are described as having a negative impact on the defensive capabilities of units within the Armed Forces of Ukraine. He was quoted as saying that the day featured sustained activity with multiple waves of fire from different weapon systems, creating a cumulative strain on Ukrainian defenses. The assessment underscores the layered nature of the attack, with ground‑launched projectiles, air‑launched ordnance, and the drone element contributing to a broad stress pattern that complicated early warning and response for Ukrainian command and control in the affected area.
On November 27, Sergey Lebedev, who coordinates the Nikolaev underground, stated that there had been a strike targeting the location of forces and equipment of the Ukrainian army in the suburbs of Kharkov. The claim fits within a wider sequence of reports from the region about shifts in force dispositions and the movement of materiel in and around Kharkivskyi oblast. The asserted strike, if verified, would mark another incident in a sequence of operations that have kept regional military activity in the public eye and reinforced concerns about ongoing threats to fortified positions and supply routes in the vicinity.
Earlier, Russian FPV drones are reported to have destroyed an APU pickup truck near Kharkov, according to the same reporting stream. Such incidents, if confirmed, would illustrate the continued use of unmanned systems to disrupt ground logistics and mobility for Ukrainian forces along the front lines and in rear areas. The overall narrative from these accounts emphasizes a period of heightened activity in the Kharkov region, with multiple capabilities employed to degrade Ukrainian military capacity and complicate allied movement and sustainment efforts in this sector.