Controversial Proposals on Immigration and Military Service in Russia
A prominent Russian official suggested a tough stance on immigrants amid the ongoing special military operation in Ukraine. Alexander Bastrykin, head of Russia’s Investigative Committee, proposed stripping citizenship from immigrants who refuse to participate in the operation. He spoke at a conference of military leaders, emphasizing that social harmony and strong inter-ethnic relations are foundational to national security during this period. The remarks were circulated via the RF IC website. (attribution: RF IC)
Bastrykin argued that during the operation, immigrants should be drawn into service. He stated that if a person does not intend to fulfill military duties as a citizen of the Russian Federation, a decision should be made to denaturalize them. This approach places citizenship status at the center of questions about loyalty and participation in national defense. (attribution: RF IC)
The proposal also touched on digital governance, with Bastrykin suggesting a requirement for a Russian SIM card to be obtained and used when creating a personal account on the State Services portal. This measure would apply from the moment a migrant enters the Russian Federation, tying mobile identity to state access and services. (attribution: RF IC)
In related developments, high-ranking security officials have noted shifts in manpower and support within the country’s unified military group. Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of the Security Council, remarked that since January 1, 2023, more than 357 thousand individuals have joined the service in the interests of this unit. (attribution: Security Council) This data is framed as part of broader efforts to strengthen Russia’s defense posture amid regional security concerns. (attribution: Security Council)
Public leaders have commented on the broader implications of immigration and defense policies. The discourse centers on how demographic changes intersect with national security, civil participation in military operations, and the administration of state services. Observers note that policy directions in this area reflect a balancing act between integration, loyalty, and practical considerations for maintaining an armed forces capable of fulfilling strategic objectives. (attribution: Kremlin communications) This evolving conversation continues to influence political debates and policy planning at the highest levels of government. (attribution: Kremlin communications)