Greenpeace Critiques Davos Private Jet Usage and Climate Impact
Greenpeace has condemned what it calls a hypocrisy-filled gathering, highlighting more than a thousand participants and urging a halt to unnecessary private flights. The Davos World Economic Forum, slated to take place in the Swiss town next week, is linked to a volume of greenhouse gas emissions comparable to those produced by 350,000 vehicles traveling 750 kilometers each day for an entire week.
Emissions figures come from an NGO study conducted with the Dutch consultancy Delft, which estimated that 1,040 private jets used the Davos airports during the week of the event. The analysis indicates that CO2 emissions from these airports during those days were four times higher than in the rest of the year, underscoring the environmental cost of the forum’s private travel arrangements.
Also, the study reveals that more than half of the flights were short haul, under 750 kilometers, with 38 percent flying under 500 kilometers. One flight reportedly covered a distance of only 21 kilometers. The report identifies Germany, France, Italy, and Spain as the countries with the heaviest Davos traffic.
The NGO criticizes the 2023 World Economic Forum for planning to analyze pathways to address the climate crisis through bold collective action while drawing attention to the uneven distribution of wealth and influence. Eva Saldana, Executive Director of Greenpeace Spain, describes Davos as representing the most perverse facet of a failing socio-economic system. She argues that an elite circle seeks to project an image of sustainability while concentrating obscene wealth and power, thereby endangering lives by profiting at the expense of the majority of people and the planet.
Private Jets as Symbols of Inequality and Environmental Harm
Greenpeace’s European mobility campaign spokesperson, Klara Maria Schenk, voices concern about the fact that the wealthy and influential continue to travel by private jet to Davos to discuss climate and inequality behind closed doors. Schenk notes that private air travel remains among the most polluting and unequal transport modes and points to record warmth in Europe to illustrate the broader context of climate impact.
The study cites a striking fact: while many individuals have never flown, they bear the consequences of aviation emissions. The phrase climate bombs is used to describe private jet travel and its disproportionate burden on the climate and vulnerable populations.
The World Economic Forum is criticized for presenting itself as a promoter of the Paris Agreement while hosting a forum that many view as a symbol of exclusivity. If a green future is to be real, the report argues, private jets and short-haul flights ought to be curtailed, with leaders setting a tangible example that aligns with broader climate goals and social equity.
Further considerations are encouraged as governments and organizations reassess travel norms in light of climate realities. The overall message from Greenpeace stresses accountability, transparency, and a move toward more sustainable modes of engagement that do not disproportionately burden the planet or people around the world.
….
Contact details for the environmental department have been removed from this article to maintain privacy and focus on publicly available information.