no data
Fisheries tourism, aquaculture tourism, or fishing tourism play a growing role in Spain and Galicia. The regulatory framework, as noted by national and regional authorities, points to a rising potential for sea related experiences that blend culture, recreation, and coastal livelihoods. This shift envisions ships and ports taking on new uses, expanding opportunities for coastal communities that rely on fishing but seek diversified income streams. Some Galician shipowners anticipate participation from major fishing hubs such as Vigo, Burela, and Celeiro as these activities develop.
The measure related to bottom fishing, which faced a veto, has been the subject of debate at the European level. Brussels issued a decision in mid September and the central government questioned this in the Court of Justice of the European Union. A written inquiry from several representatives sought to understand what steps would be taken to support fleets affected by the regulation. The response highlighted that member states may support their fleets through diversification of activities with public funds from the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund or similar aid schemes.
The response also clarified that the regulation in question came into force in early October and was implemented without a socioeconomic impact assessment. It was reported that in a subset of affected zones the depth criterion did not reach a key threshold. The discussions indicate that only modest funds are available for mitigating sector losses, and that Spain would determine the allocation details. In addition to funds aimed at diversifying activities beyond traditional fishing, there are rules governing de minimis aid that cap financial support to a given company over a three year period.
The commissioner has maintained the regulation as it stands, noting the responsibility of national authorities to enforce it. The stance emphasizes that the data provided by member states must be accurate. For example, the international marine exploration body reported that Spain faced challenges in reporting vessel monitoring and related data two decades ago. The commission remains engaged, requesting precise information about potential effects on certain fleets over the past years.
no data
Even without all the exact figures, a rule was applied that affected the longline fleets in ways tied to the emerging framework. The assessment acknowledges that making a clear preference is difficult when socioeconomic impacts are not fully known. Some fishermen frequent specific areas as a routine, and even if the effort shown is limited, it can carry significance for their livelihoods.
Analysts warn that there is not yet a study that pinpoints fixed gear impacts on the seabed in contrast to moving gear. The benthic footprint and the broader effects of certain gear remain largely unexplored. The bottom fishing veto, which hit mainly longlines, was approved after consultations described by officials. In public statements the commission indicated that consultations included industry participation and input from national administrations and all interested parties before proposing the implementing regulation.