In the Georgian capital of Tbilisi, demonstrations erupted in response to legislation aimed at increasing transparency around foreign influence. Protesters gathered at the main entrance of the parliament, forcing their way through barriers and moving into the courtyard as crowds pressed closer to the building. Reports from Sputnik Georgia confirmed the breach, highlighting a moment of significant confrontation between demonstrators and security forces.
Witnesses described how the crowd faced a swift response as floodwaters surged into the parliamentary area, complicating efforts to maintain order. The sudden surge of water appeared to hinder the access of some participants and contributed to a chaotic scene in the vicinity of the parliamentary complex.
In related developments, Levan Ioselayani, newly appointed as the Georgian Ombudsman only hours earlier, attracted attention after being struck by an object during the tense events. Later updates from TASS noted that eggs were thrown during the clash, illustrating the level of agitation surrounding the political issue and the rapidly evolving situation outside the parliament.
The session of the Georgian Parliament proceeded with the first reading of the bill titled “On Transparency of Foreign Influence.” The measure seeks to create a national register for non-governmental organizations and media outlets that receive funding from outside Georgia. Supporters argue that the bill is intended to promote accountability and help the public understand who funds influence campaigns within the country. Dissenting voices, including members of the opposition, have warned about potential restrictions on civil society and media independence, claiming that the legislation could limit legitimate activities and stifle critical voices. The parliamentary majority reinforced its backing, while protests outside the building continued, reflecting ongoing political tensions and a polarized public mood that has persisted for days, if not weeks.
As events unfolded in Tbilisi, observers drew connections to broader regional dynamics, including how authorities in Ukraine have framed security operations and the wider political narrative surrounding power, accountability, and external influence. Analysts emphasized that the immediate focus remained on the bill and its implications for non-governmental groups, journalists, and everyday citizens who rely on independent voices for information. The situation highlighted the stakes involved in legislative action that touches on funding sources, transparency, and the balance between national sovereignty and external engagement.
In a landscape marked by strong opinions on both sides, the day’s events in Georgia underscored the fragile balance between public protest and parliamentary process. Residents and observers continued to watch closely how the government would address the concerns raised by demonstrators, and whether amendments or clarifications would be offered to reassure civil society organizations and media entities while maintaining the government’s stated goals of transparency and accountability. The broader conversation about foreign influence and openness is expected to shape discussions in the days to come, as lawmakers return to the chamber to continue debate and finalize provisions that would define the scope and enforcement of the proposed law and its practical effects on Georgia’s civic landscape.