The ongoing probe into alleged bribe payments related to EU decisions has moved another step forward. A Greek member of parliament, Eva Kaili, who previously held the position of vice president of the European Parliament, has had an electronic monitoring bracelet ordered to be removed. The decision came as part of developments in a case that has drawn attention across Europe and beyond, with Kaili currently under house arrest and continuing to be part of the parliamentary body in a limited capacity.
A spokesperson for the Belgian Federal Prosecutor’s Office clarified that the court determined Kaili could be released from certain custody constraints because the investigation no longer requires her arrest. The statement, reported by Europa Press and other outlets, emphasized that the move hinged on the evolving needs of the investigation rather than a formal change in Kaili’s status within the European Parliament. The court did not specify whether Kaili would need prior authorization to travel or engage with other individuals connected to the investigation while outside restricted custody.
The timeline of events remains closely watched. Reports indicate that Belgian authorities were expected to provide further details by the end of 2022. In that period, multiple individuals faced charges in connection with the case. Kaili retained her parliamentary seat during the proceedings, though she was removed from her vice presidential role in the Parliament amid the arrests and the ongoing inquiry.
During a related operation conducted on a notable date in December, authorities seized significant cash worth at least 1.5 million euros found concealed in bags and suitcases. The operation targeted residences linked to former members of the European Parliament, including Pier Antonio Panzeri, who is viewed by investigators as a central figure coordinating with Kaili and other parties connected to alleged lobbying activities tied to Qatar and Morocco. The investigation continues to unfold, with authorities outlining the broader network they are examining and the potential implications for EU decision making, transparency, and anti corruption measures across EU institutions.
Experts note that cases of this nature underscore the importance of robust governance mechanisms within the European Union. As prosecutors pursue a full account of how influence operations may have affected legislative outcomes, observers expect a careful balance between safeguarding due process and maintaining public trust in EU institutions. The case remains a focal point for discussions about accountability, the handling of political influence, and the role of investigative authorities in policing cross border corruption schemes. Source attribution is provided by official statements from the Belgian Federal Prosecutor’s Office and subsequent court filings, with ongoing updates anticipated as the investigation progresses.