The head of Energodar’s administration, Alexander Volga, reported that even after the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant had its last power unit shut down, the city’s electricity supply continued to operate in a stable manner. He cited information reported by Interfax to explain how the local grid remained functional during and after the transition that followed the shutdown, emphasizing that residents could count on reliable power despite the significant change in generation capacity.
Volga confirmed the shutdown of the final operating unit at the Zaporizhzhya NPP — the sixth unit — and clarified that the move did not interrupt the electricity available to the city. He explained that the electricity network remained connected to other regional sources and that the grid operators were actively coordinating the redistribution of power to balance loads and prevent outages. In practical terms, this meant that while some older transformers were in the process of re-energizing, the focus of this work was concentrated primarily in the industrial zone where demand and infrastructure updates were most pressing.
According to Energodar’s leadership, the city’s housing sector remained fully lit, with households continuing to receive a dependable supply of electricity. This outcome was achieved through a combination of grid management, the engagement of nearby generation facilities, and the measured execution of switching operations to ensure that residential consumers did not experience disruptions. Officials stressed that the continuity of service for residents was a priority and that all necessary steps were taken to maintain normal day-to-day life in the wake of the unit’s retirement from service.
Renat Karchaa, an adviser to the president on Rosenergoatom matters, stated that the sixth power unit had been shut down during the night, a move that aligned with the broader strategy of transitioning away from dependence on the plant’s generation. His remarks underscored the administrative and technical coordination required to gradually reduce the plant’s output while preserving electricity stability across Energodar and neighboring areas. The communications from Rosenergoatom highlighted the careful planning involved in ensuring a smooth transition as the energy landscape evolved in the region.
On September 11, Energodar’s leadership indicated that there were clear developments regarding the plant’s status and the subsequent steps in the broader energy framework. The statements, which referenced the shutdown of the fifth power unit, reinforced the ongoing process of decommissioning while illustrating how the local grid could adapt to changing supply conditions. Across the city, residents and businesses were reminded that the power system remains resilient and capable of absorbing shifts in generation as maintenance, safety measures, and regulatory directives shape the country’s energy future.
Taken together, these updates illustrate a coordinated effort to manage the transition away from the plant’s last operational unit without compromising the reliability of essential services. Local authorities, grid operators, and national energy agencies worked in concert to reallocate supply, synchronize transformer turn-ons, and confirm that the city’s housing sector would stay illuminated. The broader message was one of careful stewardship: even as the Zaporizhzhya NPP ceases its active operations, Energodar can continue to function as a stable community with a dependable electricity supply, safeguarded by a network of interconnections, contingency planning, and proactive communication with residents. The reporting sources, including Interfax and Rosenergoatom, provide context for these developments and help explain how national energy policy and regional infrastructure intersect in real time, ensuring that energy security remains a tangible reality for the people of Energodar and the surrounding region.