On a Saturday night, a car bombing occurred, taking the life of Daria Duguina and drawing international attention to the figures surrounding her. The Russian thinker Alexander Dugin has long been nicknamed “Rasputin” by some observers for his influence on political and strategic discussions that extend far beyond Russia. Though his role in policy-making is widely debated, his ideas have shaped conversations among some of the world’s elites and have traveled well beyond Russia’s borders. The Kremlin has shown interest in his geopolitical theories, which has led to him being perceived by some as a guru by far-right networks and as a symbol of far-reaching veering alliances in Europe, including Spain.
Duguin is associated with what is described as the fourth political theory, a populist movement that blends a planned economy with intensely conservative social values. Proponents argue for an anti-Western stance that rejects liberal democracy, socialism, and fascism as outdated frameworks. Dugin’s early political activity included founding groups that later evolved into more militant formations, which critics view as adopting a red-blue fascist symbolism while opposing liberal democracy.
Worshiping Duguin on Vox
A portion of this discourse has traction in media and political circles. One figure linked to Vox in Spain, a former leading member of a defunct nationalist party and now an assistant secretary for the party in Barcelona, has referenced Dugin in public messages. This individual, who once called Dugin a teacher, later removed some remarks from social media.
Posts circulated that celebrated Dugin as a mentor figure, with an online exchange memorializing him as a significant influence. These messages have been shared as part of broader discussions about the reach of Eurasianist ideas, which advocate a geopolitical perspective that emphasizes strong state power and a skeptical view of Western liberal order.
In several instances, the connections between Dugin’s ideas and certain public voices have extended beyond social media. Some of these figures helped translate and present Russian geopolitical thought to audiences abroad, contributing to debates about the direction of international politics and the role of Russia on the world stage.
Rejection of Liberal Democracy
Within Vox, Dugin’s presence stands out as unusual. Critics note that while the party’s leadership aligns with Atlanticist and NATO-centered viewpoints on Russia, there remains a degree of ambiguity in foreign policy that could allow Eurasian-inspired ideas to gain ground. Analysts have explored how such currents interact with broader right-wing spectrums in Europe, where some factions embrace nationalistic and conservative narratives while maintaining diverse stances on international relations.
Duguin’s critique of liberal ideas—human rights frameworks and multicultural policies—has resonated with ultranationalist circles. He has referred to open societies as a form of “the Swamp,” a label that has been picked up by other public figures who advocate restricted immigration and stronger borders. In 2019, a public figure associated with these ideas participated in a xenophobic incident targeting a migrant center, events that triggered legal scrutiny.
Despite an outward Atlanticist alignment, Vox maintains ties to conservative organizations that emphasize traditional family structures and restrict the public recognition of LGBTQ+ rights. Some observers note that the party’s foreign policy positions lack a tight, explicit framework, leaving room for Eurasian concepts to influence discourse. Analysts have suggested this dynamic can shape how some policymakers and scholars interpret Russia’s strategic moves in the region.
Founder of SCC
Duguin’s key supporters in Spain include figures who have actively engaged with anti-Russian and Eurasianist discourse. One organizer has published works that expand these ideas within Spain’s far-right ecosystem and has participated in public discussions hosted by Vox. Academic observers describe these figures as exploring how Eurasianism translates into local political activism and cultural commentary.
Another notable individual has shaped the movement by publishing and organizing forums that amplify these themes. This figure has spoken at events in Barcelona and contributed to a broader network that seeks to connect national identity with a global conversation about traditionalist values and geopolitical orientation. Public events linked to these efforts have continued to appear in recent years as part of ongoing debates about regional autonomy and foreign influence.
Historical collaborations among Dugin’s circle have included meetings with notable ideologues and thinkers who have influenced European far-right discourse. Public photographs and archived messages from these moments reflect a longstanding interest in the compatibility of nationalist ideas with broader international networks and publications that discuss geopolitics and regional alliances.
Media coverage has extended these conversations into more general public spaces, with commentators occasionally urging audiences to consider diverse philosophical perspectives on global order. Some analysts emphasize that the complexity and ambiguity of these ideas can complicate straightforward judgments about liberal democracy, while others caution against overemphasizing any single figure’s influence on a broad political landscape.
Ultra Media Coverage
Beyond party politics, the spread of these ideas has been evident in media spaces associated with the reactionary right. Public figures have drawn attention to interviews and writings that defend Russia’s actions as part of a broader existential framework and have critiqued LGBTQ rights as part of a perceived European decline.
Researchers have pointed out that the appeal of these ideas often rests on a mix of ambiguous assertions about liberal democracy and critiques of multicultural policies. The result is a discourse that can resonate with some audiences while remaining contested within mainstream political and academic circles.
In Spain, interest in these ideas has surfaced among both political and intellectual circles, with think tanks and cultural groups referencing Eurasianist themes in discussions about national identity and sovereignty. While some figures in Vox advocate for strong alignment with Western security structures, others emphasize a more flexible stance on international relations, reflecting a broader debate about how traditionalist thought adapts to modern geopolitics. Critics argue that, though these currents gain attention online and at public events, their practical influence may be limited to specific audiences and contexts.