The investigation surrounding a high‑profile homicide in Palma has moved forward as the judge issued the order against a suspect accused of murdering a young Colombian woman. The claim that the individual identified as Miguel SM was seen on Paseo Marítimo near the water’s edge in Palma, where prosecutors allege he pushed the victim twice and later discarded the body into the sea, has formed a central element of the case. The court notes that the suspect’s version, which suggests the victim was left unharmed, is starkly contradicted by security footage reviewed by the Civil Guard and the evidentiary record. These factors underpin the gravity of the charge and illuminate the perceived neglect of any obligation to assist, a point highlighted by the magistrate as part of the overall assessment of intent and conduct. The judge’s analysis points to a scenario in which the accused’s actions, as captured on the car’s camera and corroborated by subsequent data, align with a sequence that culminates in the victim’s drowning. The court has treated these elements as essential to establishing the crime of murder and the accompanying negligence surrounding the failure to render aid where it was reasonably possible to do so. (Source: Civil Guard findings and court statements)
Piedad Marín, who presides over the fourth investigative court in Palma, emphasized that the released images show a troubling encounter between the suspect and the victim at the Sant Magi pier in the early hours of August 14. Prosecutors describe a timeline in which, at roughly 3:54 a.m., the 31‑year‑old Miguel SM allegedly pushed the 25‑year‑old Daniela EV into the water twice, followed by a period during which a mobile phone activity trace shows an eight‑minute data connection. Moments later, three individuals appeared at the scene and moved rapidly across barriers separating the walkway from the pontoons. They are described as moving with purpose toward the area where the suspect stood, and the four individuals stayed near the water’s edge for about twenty minutes, remaining in positions from which they could observe the river and the undertow. Reportedly, the body of the victim was later recovered by several tourists. (Attribution: Court records, CCTV analysis, and Civil Guard notes)
In his testimony, Miguel SM denied the act of pushing the victim and claimed that he left her at the place with the intention of continuing his night with a drink. He described his actions as habitual movement rather than violent intent, insisting that he did not seek aid from bystanders, nor did he contact others about the incident. His account also indicated that he spent the morning at the Maritime and Gomila facilities before returning home. (Statement summarized from court testimony and police records)
Since his arrest last week, the accused gave a description to the Civil Guard, maintaining that the girl had chosen to jump into the sea for a swim. He later denied this assertion in court, confirming that he did not see anyone enter the water during the event. The discrepancy between his testimony and the documented evidence has become a focal point for prosecutors, who argue that the contradiction signals an attempt to minimize responsibility for the crime. (Civil Guard interview notes and court cross‑examination)
According to investigative reports, the night unfolded after the two met in a game room in the Camí Salard district, close to the defendant’s residence. Security cameras in the area provided critical visual confirmation that linked the two individuals to the vicinity of the water at the relevant time. Analyzing facial features and clothing enabled investigators to corroborate the pair’s presence near the sea, a finding that forms a key component of the prosecution’s assertion of wrongdoing. (Evidence synthesis from building CCTV archives and facial recognition notes)
The court’s decision highlights inconsistencies in the suspect’s statements, arguing that the overall narrative offered by Miguel SM clashes with the collected evidence. The severity of the charges, paired with the strength of the evidentiary record, supports the rationale for his continued detention. The ongoing investigation intensifies as authorities seek to identify three additional individuals who reportedly visited the crime scene, with the aim of reconstructing the sequence of events that led to the tragedy. (Court assessment and ongoing Civil Guard inquiries)
As the case unfolds, legal observers note that the combination of surveillance footage, mobile data records, and witness testimony creates a comprehensive evidentiary framework. This framework is expected to guide the court’s final ruling and determine the level of culpability attached to the suspect, as well as any potential auxiliary charges arising from the events at the pier. (Analytical brief prepared for ongoing court proceedings)