Colombia saw a notable drop in violent deaths last year, according to official data that show a decrease from 14,160 to 13,896. General Henry Sanabria assumed the role of Chief of Police on August 2, just days before his arrival. The government acknowledges this smaller but meaningful decline while Sanabria navigates scrutiny tied to his personal religious beliefs and statements that have sparked controversy within the security force and broader public discourse.
The government’s Department of Defense notes the improvement, yet Sanabria remains at the center of an unusual mix of faith, duty, and public debate. He hails from Sanabria, North America, and his recent comments have touched on topics such as exorcism and protective rituals within the police service, drawing attention to how personal beliefs intersect with professional responsibilities. Observers describe the situation as a clash between traditional faith practices and modern policing duties in a security apparatus that serves a diverse population.
Earlier this week, Sanabria spoke with a national magazine, saying he had perceived spiritual disturbances and highlighted the potential benefits of a police app designed to counteract harmful supernatural beliefs. He stated that the initiative would be pursued within the framework of collaboration with the military bishopric, emphasizing a cautious approach to phenomena some describe as demonic activity. He cited cases of nighttime marks on individuals who reported unsettling dreams and waking sensations, though he stressed these incidents do not cause physical injury.
Public light and private conviction
Sanabria’s remarks have created a mixed reception. Some see his personal spiritual focus as a shield against crime, while others interpret it as a distraction from frontline policing. He has expressed that he welcomes criticism and believes his devotion to faith can coexist with his public duties. He also notes that a strong interest in scripture can coexist with a professional calling in law enforcement.
The general has repeatedly stated that his aim is to honor constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion while serving in uniform. He recalls Article 19 of the Constitution, which guarantees broad freedom of expression and belief, and stresses that his faith does not override his obligation to uphold the law.
In a social media post captured by a public feed, Sanabria shared a political-religious message, emphasizing compassion and respectful conduct toward others. The post echoes a biblical verse, urging readers to treat others with the same courtesy they would desire for themselves. The message drew a wide range of reactions from the public and from political commentators alike.
Public unrest
Sanabria’s statements have ignited discussion on social networks, with some labeling certain beliefs as controversial. Critics have pointed to his remarks about the role of faith in policing and his comments on diversity within the force, including individuals who identify with LGBTQ+ communities. Opponents argue that speaking about sensitive topics in this way can appear biased, while supporters contend that a strong personal faith can coexist with a commitment to public service.
Observers note that the security chief’s approach has sparked debates about how leaders communicate policy and moral positions. The discourse has included reflections from historians and political analysts, who suggest that comments made by national leaders on faith matters can influence the public perception of the police and the government’s stance on human rights and inclusive governance.
Several social media posts from public figures have echoed these divides. For instance, comments by a prominent city mayor and a well-known historian highlighted differing views on how government officials should address faith-based expressions within state institutions. These voices illustrate the broader tension between personal belief and professional responsibility in public life.
Analysts emphasize that maintaining credibility requires careful alignment between stated beliefs and official actions, particularly in sensitive areas such as security, crime prevention, and inclusion. The conversation underscores the need for clear guidelines on how religious beliefs may inform policy without affecting impartial enforcement of the law.
Government response
The defense minister weighed in on the matter, urging restraint in public statements that could influence complex security situations. He cautioned that officials should communicate carefully and maintain focus on concrete policy outcomes rather than personal or religious viewpoints.
President Petro returned from an international summit and faced questions about Sanabria. He noted that progress has been made in drug prohibition efforts and stressed the police’s role in resolving conflicts in regions such as Bajo Cauca and Caquetá without repeating past human rights abuses. He reiterated that decisions about law enforcement must be guided by laws and universal rights rather than personal beliefs.
The president acknowledged Sanabria’s faith while emphasizing that public duties should adhere to the norms of the constitution. He indicated that the matter would be addressed directly, noting that personal attitude toward religion should not undermine the professional responsibilities of a police commander. After the discussion, Sanabria was photographed publicly with a priest, accompanied by a biblical verse about confession and forgiveness that he shared on social media. He conveyed a resolve to continue focusing on the security mission ahead.