Disqualifications frame the debate between supporters who claim that cat colonies persist and scientists who warn about their impact on biodiversity. To understand the issue and craft a viable response, three core points must be considered. First, are people with cats to blame? Those who care for cat colonies are not responsible for their existence. They take in abandoned animals found on the street, often because they were born there or because someone left them behind. Their intention is to provide care to creatures that have already become part of the urban landscape, not to create a situation of ongoing harm. Responsibility for what happens next lies not with the caretakers but with the systems that allow abandonment and poor animal welfare to persist. Second, is the scientific community lying? The warnings about the presence of these cats on public streets and the harm to native wildlife come from extensive data collection and multiple studies. These findings are rooted in observable evidence and long-term surveys conducted by qualified researchers, not in belief or sentiment. The conclusions reflect systematic observation, rigorous methods, and peer-reviewed results that point to real ecological consequences. Third, what should be done? Reaching a consensus that respects both sides is essential. The methods used to control the cat population to date have either fallen short or have not been properly implemented. This makes it urgent to initiate sterilization programs that are technically sound and specifically designed, ideally requiring sterilization of all members of a colony or at least all female cats. Such a policy would prevent further births and gradually reduce colony growth. In addition, colonies must be tracked, monitored, and, if needed, controlled through an effective surveillance system that employs cameras. The goal is to discourage new animals from being abandoned nearby and, if an abandonment has occurred, to enable rapid identification and neutering. Vaccination, deworming, and microchip verification should accompany neutering wherever feasible to ensure comprehensive health checks and traceability. Town halls responsible for local animal welfare should include veterinarians as part of their teams to guarantee that these programs are properly planned and executed. This professional presence is crucial for success in this and many other public health and welfare matters. When these steps are fulfilled, the growth of cat colonies can be curbed, enabling more effective management and ongoing maintenance. This approach helps address the ecological concerns highlighted by the scientific community while ensuring the protection and welfare of all animals, including cats, within the urban environment.
Truth Social Media News Cat colony management: balancing care, science, and public welfare
on17.10.2025