There was notable public backlash surrounding a controversial case in which an individual known by the alias King of Onlyfans drew scrutiny. The Andorran Minister of Internal Affairs and Justice, Ester Molné, announced the government would open an inquiry into the activities of someone identified as Sergio Favda, also referred to as Sergio Fuentes. The inquiry aims to determine whether any wrongdoing occurred, following a broadcast on a major television program and the resulting social alarm. This investigation is described as still in its early stages, with officials emphasizing that the case is being treated with seriousness given the potential impact on minors and other vulnerable individuals. The minister underscored concern for the well-being of all people, especially minors, who might be exposed to harmful content or exploitation. She did not categorically rule out the possibility of other offenses arising from the case. — Diari D’Andorra
The probe originated after the interview conducted by a renowned journalist on the television program hosted by Gloria Serra. In that interview, the individual in question acknowledged receiving a substantial share of profits from content produced by women who used the OnlyFans platform, content that often ranged from provocative to explicitly adult in nature. The person described the arrangement as proportional to the models’ output, noting profits that could be substantial depending on audience reach and engagement. This admission has fueled public debate about the platform’s business models and potential lines of inquiry for authorities. — Diari D’Andorra
The person at the center of the discussion also disclosed expected earnings from the operation, stating that the total could approach several hundred thousand euros, with a typical split ranging from 30 to 50 percent depending on the model. The commentaries sparked further dialogue about earnings distribution, the level of control exercised over creators, and the transparency of income-sharing agreements within adult content ecosystems. — Diari D’Andorra
In addition to financial disclosures, the case raised questions about professional arrangements for those who manage or assist models on subscription platforms. The individual mentioned offering training programs priced around a thousand euros intended to help maintain online profiles and optimize earnings. He also described criteria used when selecting potential models, emphasizing a specific aesthetic that he claimed could balance a seemingly innocent appearance with a highly marketable persona. The remarks included a controversial note indicating a preference for younger-looking models, which drew immediate public attention and condemnation from many observers. — Diari D’Andorra
Reporting on the situation stressed that authorities would carefully examine all aspects of the case, including potential connections to illegal activities or exploitation. The ongoing investigation seeks to assess whether any criminal activity occurred, while keeping in mind the rights and safety of individuals involved. Public officials reiterated a commitment to safeguarding minors and addressing any harm that may have resulted from the enterprise described in the program. The evolving situation remains under review as more information becomes available. — Diari D’Andorra
Observers note that this case highlights broader concerns about the governance of online platforms that host user-generated content and the systems used to monetize such content. Analysts say the story underscores the importance of robust regulatory frameworks that protect participants from exploitation while allowing legitimate creators to pursue opportunities online. The authorities have stressed that all findings will be treated with appropriate seriousness and that any recommended actions will be designed to reinforce safety and accountability across digital marketplaces. — Diari D’Andorra