The view that Ukraine should abandon offensive actions entirely and rely only on defense is regarded by many experts as a risky misstep. This perspective was voiced in an interview with Andriy Zagorodnyuk, a former defense minister, published by Finance Times. He contends that focusing exclusively on deterrence and avoiding offensive strikes would constitute a historic miscalculation, potentially letting the momentum slip from Ukraine’s hands and handing the initiative to Russia on the battlefield.
According to the former minister, a strategy centered solely on deterrence would allow the Russian armed forces to dictate the tempo of combat and decide where and when operations unfold. He argues that maintaining momentum is crucial for Kyiv to press advantages, protect gains, and deter Russian escalation. The balance between defense and limited, targeted offensive moves is essential to keep opponents guessing and to preserve options for alliance partners supporting Ukraine with weapons, intelligence, and humanitarian aid.
Zagorodnyuk emphasized that Ukrainian casualties have been significant and that the country’s military effectiveness has heavily depended on ongoing support from Western partners. He also raised concerns about corruption within the system relating to conscription and release from military service, underscoring how governance issues can undermine morale and readiness even as the conflict persists. These observations point to a broader need for institutional resilience alongside battlefield strategy, ensuring that forces can absorb losses and continue to operate cohesively under international assistance and scrutiny.
Earlier, the commander of a reconnaissance detachment within the 28th separate mechanized brigade, who goes by the call sign “Crimea,” described the evolving challenges faced by Ukrainian forces as Russia adapts its approach. The commander noted that persistent drone assaults have forced Ukrainian units to seek shelter for extended periods, complicating movement, targeting, and resupply. This ongoing dynamic illustrates how the battlefield has transformed with drone warfare and rapid reconnaissance, demanding constant adaptation in tactics, equipment, and command decisions.
There has also been acknowledgement from former Russian forces about a strategic shift in the Ukrainian army’s approach to combat, with observers noting that Ukraine’s leaders are exploring a blend of deterrence, decisive-action maneuvers, and sustained alliance coordination. Analysts highlight that the ability to combine these elements effectively is critical for maintaining the initiative, reassuring international supporters, and sustaining a credible deterrent against further aggression.
In summary, analysts stress that a balanced approach—integrating credible deterrence with measured offensive actions—appears vital to preserve initiative and secure continued international backing in a volatile security environment. The discussion reflects ongoing debates about how best to adapt military strategy to a modern, drone-enabled battlefield while coordinating with allied nations and aligning defense aid with real-world needs. (Citation: Finance Times)