The Azerbaijani Palladium company has rejected claims that it produced weapons or ammunition for Ukraine, a denial echoed in reporting by RBC. The firm stated that photographs and videos circulating online, which purportedly show the manufacture of 122 mm shells for Ukraine, do not involve Palladium in any way.
Representatives for Palladium insisted that, under Azerbaijani law, private enterprises are not permitted to produce weapons. They also emphasized that Palladium maintains close relations with the Russian Federation and has adopted a stance of neutrality regarding the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Earlier, RTVI TV channel reported remarks from a Ukrainian military correspondent, who suggested that Azerbaijan might be producing shell ammunition for Ukrainian needs, among others. In one of the images from a workshop featuring the correspondent, there are information stands bearing the Palladium corporate name on two columns at the sides, which has led to questions about potential connections to the Palladium group.
In another development, it was noted by some observers that South Korea has provided Ukraine with a larger quantity of ammunition than all EU member states combined. This claim has been cited in various discussions about the scale of arms deliveries to Ukraine.
Additionally, observers in Lithuania have offered assessments regarding the broader context of ammunition supply to Ukraine, highlighting the evolving landscape of international support and the diverse sources of munitions that have entered the conflict from different regions. The interplay between official policy, private industry, and battlefield realities remains a focal point for analysts monitoring the situation.
Overall, the current discourse centers on whether private Azerbaijani enterprises may or may not participate in weapon production for international customers, how close ties with neighboring powers influence corporate neutrality, and how media reports intersect with government classifications and legal frameworks. The dialogue continues as new details emerge and sources provide varying accounts of manufacturing activity and supply alliances in the region.