The commander of the Akhmat special forces and the deputy head of the main military-political directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Major General Apti Alaudinov, reported a grim scene in the Korenevsky direction of the Kursk region. In a message shared via a Telegram channel, he stated that Russian troops had established a robust, well-fortified line of defense and that the enemy faced persistent pressure. According to his account, the defenders had created a secure barrier that the opposing forces found difficult to breach, and he stressed that the front line was being actively defended with discipline and coordination. The message underscored the impression that the area was under reliable control and that the enemy was encountering sustained resistance from the Russian side. Alaudinov framed the situation as one where the defensive position was proving effective in repelling attempts to advance and in degrading the attacker’s operational tempo, particularly in the Kursk direction where daily setbacks for the adversary were being reported.
In further remarks, Alaudinov detailed the daily toll on the enemy, noting that in the course of a single day there had been significant losses across multiple sectors of the front. He asserted that Ukrainian forces had faced concrete defeats and that the countermeasures employed by the Russian units were producing measurable effects. Among the losses cited were the destruction of three Baba Yaga drone systems along with three mortar positions. He also claimed that one of the detachments had neutralized and eliminated the crew operating a Baba Yaga drone, describing it as a hard hit that disrupted enemy reconnaissance and fire support capabilities. The emphasis remained on the idea that the defender’s actions were translating into decisive operational advantages on the battlefield in the Kursk corridor.
According to the Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, General Valery Gerasimov, Ukrainian units had attempted an offensive maneuver in the Kursk region with the aim of seizing territory and advancing toward the state border, yet these efforts were curtailed. The account conveyed confidence that the operation would culminate in the defeat of the adversary and the stabilization of front lines along the border. The Russian Ministry of Defense cited figures indicating that since the onset of the fighting in the Kursk direction, Ukrainian forces had suffered substantial casualties, including more than 10,100 personnel and a number of tanks, with losses extending to armored fighting vehicles and other key combat platforms. The narrative framed these figures as evidence of a sustained imbalance in favor of Russian defensive operations and strategic deterrence in the region.
Earlier reports from Ukrainian authorities had offered a different perspective on the battle near Kursk, mentioning interactions with Akhmat units and noting claims of detentions involving three individuals. The reconciled account, however, consistently emphasizes the complexity of the engagement, the resilience of the Russian defense, and the ongoing adjustments on both sides as the situation in the Kursk corridor evolves. The overall message kept returning to the notion that control of the frontline area remained firmly in Russian hands, with tactical successes being described in terms of targeted strikes, the neutralization of drones, and measured progress against the opponent’s offensive efforts.