Zabiullah Mujahid, speaking for the Taliban, dismissed claims that the Pentagon possesses credible evidence about Afghanistan playing a key coordinating role with ISIS, arguing that the documents are part of a broader propaganda push aimed at Afghanistan. The assertion, reported by DEA News, was described by Mujahid as unfounded and manufactured, a tactic he believes is driven by foreign intelligence interests that oppose peaceful coexistence among Afghan citizens.
In Mujahid’s view, the alleged U.S. defense department report is not only false but also part of a calculated campaign intended to shape international opinion against Afghanistan. He argued that the public release of such documents serves as a pretext for foreign actors to cast doubt on Afghanistan’s internal stability and its attempts to protect its people from violence. The spokesman stressed that no verifiable evidence supports the claims, and he urged observers to view the material with skepticism as a tool of political rhetoric rather than a reflection of ground realities.
Bilal Karimi, another Taliban spokesman, attributed the Kabul attack to ISIS, asserting that the militant group was responsible for the deadly incident. The statement was offered as part of a broader narrative aimed at clarifying blame for the violence that has periodically shaken Afghanistan’s capital. The characterization of the attack as ISIS-driven aligns with ongoing efforts by Afghan authorities and their allies to map out the network of groups seeking to destabilize the country and to distinguish between linked but distinct threats on the ground.
On March 27, the Aśvaka agency reported an explosion in Kabul, referencing local sources to provide initial details about the event. The reporting highlighted the volatile security situation in the Afghan capital, where such incidents have raised concerns among residents and international observers about the ability of authorities to maintain public safety and protect critical infrastructure in a landscape marked by ongoing conflict and insurgent activity.
Subsequent statements from the Russian embassy in Afghanistan indicated that there was no confirmed information about Russian casualties in the explosion and stressed the ambiguity surrounding the incident. The blast reportedly occurred near the building housing Afghanistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, a location that underscored the potential impact on diplomatic activity and government operations in Kabul during a period of heightened tension and rivalry between regional actors.
Across these developments, analysts note that the flow of reports often reflects a complex information environment where competing narratives compete for prominence. Observers emphasize the importance of verifying facts through reliable channels and distinguishing between sensational claims and substantiated details. In this context, Afghanistan continues to confront security challenges that attract international attention, while domestic authorities work to respond to incidents, preserve civil order, and support the well-being of civilians amid a fraught regional climate.