“My daughter doesn’t deserve this sentence, neither my daughter nor the other victims”. Marisol Buron Flores, Martha Calvo’s motherThere is nothing more to know about the sentence of the magistrate who avoided serving a reviewable permanent prison sentence. Jorge Ignacio Palma Jacome What today specially developed Levante-EMV, Despite a jury verdict that found him guilty last July, he was found guilty of three completed murders and seven attempted murders, all of which aggravate gender-based violence.
“I disappointed and resentful. And many more that I prefer not to say out loud. This judge did not put himself in the shoes of me or the other victims and their families. 160 years in prison is useless, with a maximum of 40 compliances that the judge included in the decision. This case is clearly a reviewable permanent prison and we will not make up with less. I will go where necessary and apply to many courts. necessary,” declared Marisol Burón Flores Upgrade-EMV, A newspaper belonging to the same group as this media.
“After the jury’s verdict, which I have no doubts about and which is very clear, hoped and hoped imposed by the judge at least one reviewable modal sentence. But this was not so. He chose to stay away from that sentence, so the only way left for us is to appeal. This doesn’t do my daughter justice.‘, concludes Marta’s mother.
“Not a peaceful phrase”
this lawyers making special charges of the eleven victims (only one of them went hand in hand with the Prosecutor’s Office) they also announced that they would appeal the sentence. TSJ and if necessary, also Supreme Court. “is-is not a peaceful phrase. It was clear that to be obtained from the sources both on our part, in private charges and in defense”, said the criminal Juan Carlos Navarro and Isabel Carricondorepresents eight of the victims, two of the deceased (Arliene Ramos and Lady Marcela Vargas) and six of the survivors.
Along the same lines, the criminal Pilar Young, Attorney for Marta Calvo’s motherwho also declared that will appeal the decision. In the case of the young woman from Estivella, jury was extraordinarily powerful: absolute unanimity, by nine votes, to say that murderedshe Palma Jacome sexually abused who introduced him and her high purity cocaine in your genitals with the only purpose of killing himoverriding defense capacity by managing drug delivery and by performing all these actions macho dominationso the implementation aggravating gender.
Acquitted of inflicting pain on families
as much as possible crime against moral integrity, so to have deliberately exacerbating the family’s suffering by concealing the whereabouts of the corpse, is a lawyer Martha’s motherPilar Jové, as in fatherCandela Estevez, already announced in the first appeal Since the crime occurred after the sexual offence, he would not only demand the imposition of a reviewable permanent prison sentence, but would also appeal against his punishment for this moral damage, since the law was involved in one of the cases to punish that penalty.
As for Candela Estévez, still no explanation was given As to whether or not under what circumstances she will appeal the sentence, as her department has thoroughly reviewed the decision and must meet with Marta Calvo’s father before making any decision.
As for lawyers representing only surviving women, as in the case of lawyers Vicente Escribano anyone Laura Munozappeal is more unlikely, since the sentence contains practically what was claimed by them and on the same terms.